Oncologic outcomes of salvage surgery for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus initially managed with combined modality therapy Journal Article


Authors: Akbari, R. P.; Paty, P. B.; Guillem, J. G.; Weiser, M. R.; Temple, L. K.; Minsky, B. D.; Saltz, L.; Wong, W. D.
Article Title: Oncologic outcomes of salvage surgery for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus initially managed with combined modality therapy
Abstract: PURPOSE: Primary chemoradiation failure for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus is treated by surgical resection. This study evaluates the outcome of salvage surgery at one institution. METHODS: All patients (n = 177) with a diagnosis of epidermoid carcinoma of the anus undergoing surgery since 1980 were reviewed. After criteria-based exclusion (n = 115), the remaining patients (n = 62) were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed on abdominoperineal resection/low anterior resection patients. Variable comparisons were made using log-rank and Cox regression analyses. Inguinal lymph node dissection patients (n = 5) were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24.2 months. Actuarial five-year survival in all abdominoperineal resection/low anterior resection patients (n = 57) was 33 percent (median, 34.1 months). Univariate predictors of decreased survival were tumor size > 5 cm or adjacent organ involvement at salvage, positive nodal disease at salvage, and positive margins. Independent predictors of decreased survival were the same except for tumor size or adjacent organ involvement at salvage (not significant). Patients undergoing potentially curative resections (n = 47) had an actuarial five-year survival of 40 percent (median, 49 months). The univariate and multivariate predictors of both decreased survival and recurrence in this subgroup included: disease persistence after chemoradiation and nodal disease at salvage. Tumor size > 5 cm or adjacent organ involvement at salvage predicted recurrence with only univariate analysis. Interestingly, actuarial five-year survival after potentially curative resection for recurrence after chemoradiation was 51 percent (as opposed to 31 percent for persistence). After potentially curative resections, most documented recurrences (79 percent) occurred within two years and were locoregional (74 percent). Actuarial five-year recurrence-free survival was 46 percent. Three of five inguinal lymph node dissection patients were alive without disease at 21.2, 81.7, and 84.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage surgery after failed chemoradiation therapy has a reasonable chance of cure. Favorable independent prognostic factors include recurrence (vs. persistence) after chemoradiation (when salvage is potentially curative), absence of nodal disease at salvage, and negative margins. Salvage inguinal lymph node dissection after failed chemoradiation therapy also is potentially curative.
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; cancer survival; treatment outcome; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; survival analysis; cancer surgery; treatment failure; retrospective studies; major clinical study; review; cancer recurrence; salvage therapy; squamous cell carcinoma; carcinoma, squamous cell; cisplatin; fluorouracil; multimodality cancer therapy; cancer radiotherapy; combined modality therapy; chemotherapy; lymph node metastasis; lymph node dissection; neoplasm recurrence, local; radiation; tumor volume; cancer invasion; minimal residual disease; neoplasm, residual; mitomycin c; inguinal lymph node; rectum anterior resection; rectum abdominoperineal resection; colectomy; abdominoperineal resection; anus surgery; anal cancer; anus neoplasms; anus carcinoma; salvage surgery; humans; prognosis; human; male; female
Journal Title: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume: 47
Issue: 7
ISSN: 0012-3706
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2004-05-28
Start Page: 1136
End Page: 1144
Language: English
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 15164245
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0548-5
DOI/URL:
Notes: Dis. Colon Rectum -- Cited By (since 1996):54 -- Export Date: 16 June 2014 -- CODEN: DICRA C2 - 15164245 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Patrick Akbari
    4 Akbari
  2. Leonard B Saltz
    790 Saltz
  3. Philip B Paty
    496 Paty
  4. Bruce Minsky
    306 Minsky
  5. Jose Guillem
    414 Guillem
  6. Martin R Weiser
    534 Weiser
  7. Larissa Temple
    193 Temple
  8. Douglas W Wong
    178 Wong