Using health-related quality of life measures to predict cardiac function in survivors exposed to anthracyclines Journal Article


Authors: Ginsberg, J. P.; Cnaan, A.; Zhao, H.; Clark, B. J.; Paridon, S. M.; Chin, A. J.; Rychik, J.; Hogarty, A. N.; Barber, G.; Rutkowski, M.; Kimball, T. R.; Delaat, C.; Steinherz, L. J.; Silber, J. H.
Article Title: Using health-related quality of life measures to predict cardiac function in survivors exposed to anthracyclines
Abstract: Purpose: As the number of pediatric cancer survivors increases, so does the number of survivors previously exposed to anthracyclines as part of their cancer therapy. Because screening is costly, some have suggested that health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures might be useful in focusing screening tests on those patients with cases most likely to display positive findings. This study reports on the predictive ability of HRQL measures to detect patients with abnormalities on serial cardiac testing. Methods: Using 127 patients from the ACE-Inhibitor after Anthracycline (AAA) Trial, this study compared serial measures of the Short Form-36 (SF-36; for ages > 13 years) and Child Health Questionnaire-Child Form 87 (CHQ-CF87; for ages ≤ 13 years) to serial cardiac performance tests including echocardiographic shortening fraction, left ventricular end systolic wall stress (LVESWS), LVESWS-index, and maximal cardiac index (MCI; a measure of cardiac output at peak exercise). Results: Generally, there was no clinically or statistically significant correlation between any HRQL measure and any cardiac function measure except between MCI and vitality and physical functioning. For each of these measures, the correlation between MCI was statistically significant (P < .006), but each HRQL subscale could explain no more than 7% of the variation in MCI. HRQL measures were not predictive of any other cardiac function measure. Conclusion: HRQL measures should not be used in isolation as a screen for cardiac function abnormalities in patients exposed to anthracylines who already have a mild degree of ventricular dysfunction. Patient history appears to be no substitute for cardiac testing in this cohort. © 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: adolescent; adult; cancer survival; child; controlled study; preschool child; child, preschool; major clinical study; clinical trial; comparative study; neoplasm; neoplasms; quality of life; controlled clinical trial; randomized controlled trial; survivor; physiology; survivors; questionnaire; infant; prediction and forecasting; predictive value of tests; short form 36; echocardiography; anthracycline; double blind procedure; double-blind method; anthracyclines; heart; heart output; heart function; heart function test; heart function tests; cancer; humans; human; male; female; priority journal; article; heart left ventricle performance
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 22
Issue: 15
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2004-08-01
Start Page: 3149
End Page: 3155
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.01.047
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 15284267
DOI/URL:
Notes: J. Clin. Oncol. -- Cited By (since 1996):12 -- Export Date: 16 June 2014 -- CODEN: JCOND -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors