Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: A Cross-sectional survey Journal Article


Authors: Rosenberg, S. M.; Tracy, M. S.; Meyer, M. E.; Sepucha, K.; Gelber, S.; Hirshfield-Bartek, J.; Troyan, S.; Morrow, M.; Schapira, L.; Come, S. E.; Winer, E. P.; Partridge, A. H.
Article Title: Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: A Cross-sectional survey
Abstract: Background: Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) have increased dramatically, particularly among younger women with breast cancer, but little is known about how women approach the decision to have CPM. Objective: To examine preferences, knowledge, decision making, and experiences of young women with breast cancer who choose CPM. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: 8 academic and community medical centers that enrolled 550 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 years or younger between November 2006 and November 2010. Patients: 123 women without known bilateral breast cancer who reported having bilateral mastectomy. Measurements: A 1-time, 23-item survey that included items related to decision making, knowledge, risk perception, and breast cancer worry. Results: Most women indicated that desires to decrease their risk for contralateral breast cancer (98%) and improve survival (94%) were extremely or very important factors in their decision to have CPM. However, only 18% indicated that women with breast cancer who undergo CPM live longer than those who do not. BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers more accurately perceived their risk for contralateral breast cancer, whereas women without a known mutation substantially overestimated this risk. Limitations: The survey, which was administered a median of 2 years after surgery, was not validated, and some questions might have been misinterpreted by respondents or subject to recall bias. Generalizability of the findings might be limited. Conclusion: Despite knowing that CPM does not clearly improve survival, women who have the procedure do so, in part, to extend their lives. Many women overestimate their actual risk for cancer in the unaffected breast. Interventions aimed at improving risk communication in an effort to promote evidence-based decision making are warranted. © 2013 American College of Physicians.
Journal Title: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume: 159
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0003-4819
Publisher: American College of Physicians  
Date Published: 2013-09-17
Start Page: 373
End Page: 381
Language: English
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00003
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 24042365
PMCID: PMC3968260
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - Cited By (since 1996):1 - "Export Date: 1 October 2013" - "CODEN: AIMEA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Monica Morrow
    773 Morrow