Comparison of models to predict clinical failure after radical prostatectomy Journal Article


Authors: Eggener, S. E.; Vickers, A. J.; Serio, A. M.; Donovan, M. J.; Khan, F. M.; Bayer-Zubek, V.; Verbel, D.; Cordon-Cardo, C.; Reuter, V. E.; Bianco, F. J.; Scardino, P. T.
Article Title: Comparison of models to predict clinical failure after radical prostatectomy
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Models are available to accurately predict biochemical disease recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Because not all patients experiencing BCR will progress to metastatic disease, it is appealing to determine postoperatively which patients are likely to manifest systemic disease. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 881 patients undergoing RP between 1985 and 2003. Clinical failure (CF) was defined as metastases, a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in a castrate state, or death from prostate cancer. The cohort was randomized into training and validation sets. The accuracy of 4 models to predict clinical outcome within 5 years of RP were compared: 'postoperative BCR nomogram' and 'Cox regression CF model' based on standard clinical and pathologic parameters, and 2 CF 'systems pathology' models that integrate clinical and pathologic parameters with quantitative histomorphometric and immu- nofluorescent biomarker features ('systems pathology Models 1 and 2'). RESULTS: When applied to the validation set, the concordance index for the postoperative BCR nomogram was 0.85, for the Cox regression CF model 0.84, for systems pathology Model 1 0.81, and for systems pathology Model 2 0.85. CONCLUSIONS: Models predicting either BCR or CF after RP exhibit similarly high levels of accuracy because standard clinical and pathologic variables appear to be the primary determinants of both outcomes. It is possible that introducing current or novel biomarkers found to be uniquely associated with disease progression may further enhance the accuracy of the systems pathology-based platform. © 2009 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; aged; middle aged; treatment failure; major clinical study; disease course; cancer recurrence; outcome assessment; sensitivity and specificity; biological marker; prostate specific antigen; accuracy; metastasis; immunofluorescence; prediction; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; proportional hazards model; death; training; prostatectomy; neoplasm metastasis; predictive value of tests; recurrent disease; radical prostatectomy; metastases; parameter; morphometrics; systems theory; validation studies as topic
Journal Title: Cancer
Volume: 115
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0008-543X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2009-01-15
Start Page: 303
End Page: 310
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24016
PUBMED: 19025977
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC2740715
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 5" - "Export Date: 30 November 2010" - "CODEN: CANCA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Peter T Scardino
    671 Scardino
  2. Andrew J Vickers
    888 Vickers
  3. Angel M Cronin
    145 Cronin
  4. Victor Reuter
    1229 Reuter