Combined and interactive effects of environmental and gwas-identified risk factors in ovarian cancer Journal Article


Authors: Pearce, C. L.; Rossing, M. A.; Lee, A. W.; Ness, R. B.; Webb, P. M.; Chenevix-Trench, G.; Jordan, S. M.; Stram, D. A.; Chang-Claude, J.; Hein, R.; Nickels, S.; Lurie, G.; Thompson, P. J.; Carney, M. E.; Goodman, M. T.; Moysich, K.; Hogdall, E.; Jensen, A.; Goode, E. L.; Fridley, B. L.; Cunningham, J. M.; Vierkant, R. A.; Weber, R. P.; Ziogas, A.; Anton-Culver, H.; Gayther, S. A.; Gentry-Maharaj, A.; Menon, U.; Ramus, S. J.; Brinton, L.; Wentzensen, N.; Lissowska, J.; Garcia-Closas, M.; Massuger, L. F. A. G.; Kiemeney, L. A. L. M.; Van Altena, A. M.; Aben, K. K. H.; Berchuck, A.; Doherty, J. A.; Iversen, E.; McGuire, V.; Moorman, P. G.; Pharoah, P.; Pike, M. C.; Risch, H.; Sieh, W.; Stram, D. O.; Terry, K. L.; Whittemore, A.; Wu, A. H.; Schildkraut, J. M.; Kjaer, S. K.
Article Title: Combined and interactive effects of environmental and gwas-identified risk factors in ovarian cancer
Abstract: Background: There are several well-established environmental risk factors for ovarian cancer, and recent genome-wide association studies have also identified six variants that influence disease risk. However, the interplay between such risk factors and susceptibility loci has not been studied. Methods: Data from 14 ovarian cancer case-control studies were pooled, and stratified analyses by each environmental risk factor with tests for heterogeneity were conducted to determine the presence of interactions for all histologic subtypes. A genetic 'risk score' was created to consider the effects of all six variants simultaneously. A multivariate model was fit to examine the association between all environmental risk factors and genetic risk score on ovarian cancer risk. Results: Among 7,374 controls and 5,566 cases, there was no statistical evidence of interaction between the six SNPs or genetic risk score and the environmental risk factors on ovarian cancer risk. In a main effects model, women in the highest genetic risk score quartile had a 65% increased risk of ovarian cancer compared with women in the lowest [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.48-1.84]. Analyses by histologic subtype yielded risk differences across subtype for endometriosis (Phet > 0.001), parity (Phet > 0.01), and tubal ligation (Phet = 0.041). Conclusions: The lack of interactions suggests that a multiplicative model is the best fit for these data. Under such a model, we provide a robust estimate of the effect of each risk factor that sets the stage for absolute risk prediction modeling that considers both environmental and genetic risk factors. Further research into the observed differences in risk across histologic subtype is warranted. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(5); 880-90. © 2013 AACR.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; aged; middle aged; major clinical study; single nucleotide polymorphism; case-control studies; cancer risk; ovarian neoplasms; genetic predisposition to disease; ovary cancer; genetic association; genotype; genome-wide association study; risk factors; histology; scoring system; genetic screening; environmental exposure; genetic heterogeneity; endometriosis; medical history; gene-environment interaction; uterine tube ligation
Journal Title: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume: 22
Issue: 5
ISSN: 1055-9965
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2013-05-01
Start Page: 880
End Page: 890
Language: English
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1030-t
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 23462924
PMCID: PMC3963289
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 1 July 2013" - "CODEN: CEBPE" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Malcolm Pike
    190 Pike