Assessment of multifactor gene-environment interactions and ovarian cancer risk: Cndidate genes, obesity, and hormone-related risk factors Journal Article


Authors: Usset, J. L.; Raghavan, R.; Tyrer, J. P.; McGuire, V.; Sieh, W.; Webb, P.; Chang-Claude, J.; Rudolph, A.; Anton-Culver, H.; Berchuck, A.; Brinton, L.; Cunningham, J. M.; DeFazio, A.; Doherty, J. A.; Edwards, R. P.; Gayther, S. A.; Gentry-Maharaj, A.; Goodman, M. T.; Høgdall, E.; Jensen, A.; Johnatty, S. E.; Kiemeney, L. A.; Kjaer, S. K.; Larson, M. C.; Lurie, G.; Massuger, L.; Menon, U.; Modugno, F.; Moysich, K. B.; Ness, R. B.; Pike, M. C.; Ramus, S. J.; Rossing, M. A.; Rothstein, J.; Song, H.; Thompson, P. J.; Van Den Berg, D. J.; Vierkant, R. A.; Wang-Gohrke, S.; Wentzensen, N.; Whittemore, A. S.; Wilkens, L. R.; Wu, A. H.; Yang, H.; Pearce, C. L.; Schildkraut, J. M.; Pharoah, P.; Goode, E. L.; Fridley, B. L.; on behalf of the Cancer Association Consortium; the Australian Cancer Study
Article Title: Assessment of multifactor gene-environment interactions and ovarian cancer risk: Cndidate genes, obesity, and hormone-related risk factors
Abstract: Background: Many epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk factors relate to hormone exposure and elevated estrogen levels are associated with obesity in postmenopausal women. Therefore, we hypothesized that gene?environment interactions related to hormone-related risk factors could differ between obese and nonobese women. Methods: We considered interactions between 11,441 SNPs within 80 candidate genes related to hormone biosynthesis and metabolism and insulin-like growth factors with six hormonerelated factors (oral contraceptive use, parity, endometriosis, tubal ligation, hormone replacement therapy, and estrogen use) and assessed whether these interactions differed between obese and non-obese women. Interactions were assessed using logistic regression models and data from 14 case?control studies (6,247 cases; 10,379 controls). Histotype-specific analyses were also completed. Results: SNPs in the following candidate genes showed notable interaction: IGF1R (rs41497346, estrogen plus progesterone hormone therapy, histology = all, P = 4.9 × 10-6) and ESR1 (rs12661437, endometriosis, histology=all, P=1.5×10-5). The most notable obesity?gene?hormone risk factor interaction was within INSR (rs113759408, parity, histology=endometrioid, P= 8.8 × 10-6). Conclusions: We have demonstrated the feasibility of assessing multifactor interactions in large genetic epidemiology studies. Follow-up studies are necessary to assess the robustness of our findings for ESR1, CYP11A1, IGF1R, CYP11B1, INSR, and IGFBP2. Future work is needed to develop powerful statistical methods able to detect these complex interactions. Impact: Assessment of multifactor interaction is feasible, and, here, suggests that the relationship between genetic variants within candidate genes and hormone-related risk factorsmay vary EOC susceptibility. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.
Journal Title: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume: 25
Issue: 5
ISSN: 1055-9965
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2016-05-01
Start Page: 780
End Page: 790
Language: English
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-1039
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC4873330
PUBMED: 26976855
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 June 2016 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Malcolm Pike
    189 Pike