Overlapping and distinct mechanisms of action of multiple sclerosis therapies Journal Article


Authors: Graber, J. J.; McGraw, C. A.; Kimbrough, D.; Dhib-Jalbut, S.
Article Title: Overlapping and distinct mechanisms of action of multiple sclerosis therapies
Abstract: In the last two decades MS has changed from an idiopathic condition with only symptomatic treatments to a disease with better characterized pathophysiologic underpinnings and several treatments that modify its long-term course based on specific mechanisms of action. There are now several FDA approved options for therapy at the onset of disease, and discussions have begun on choosing the best treatment in individual patients and what option to choose next in patients who are failing their current treatment. Numerous studies have begun to highlight that the underlying pathology of CNS damage may be different in subsets of patients, raising the possibility that some may respond to a treatment with a mechanism of action that is targeted to 'their' MS. Trials are ongoing of numerous new agents with different mechanisms of action and some combination therapies. A better understanding of how each therapy works may guide decisions on initiating, combining or changing therapy in a more rational way to improve patient outcomes. Further knowledge of underlying mechanisms of disease in different patients with 'the same' disease may lead to more targeted therapies, as will biomarkers that predict clinical response to therapy. Studies of the effects of various agents used in MS reveal both overlapping and distinct mechanisms of actions that may be relevant to their efficacy and side effects in individual patients. However, it is important to remember that most agents are approved based on their reduction of MRI lesions and relapse rates over a short time frame. These measures only partially correlate with long-term disability, which may be the most relevant clinical outcome for people with MS. Fixed disability requires years to become apparent, and there is a lack of large studies of biomarkers for chronic outcomes. In addition, few large studies correlate response to therapy with cognitive outcomes, which are a major cause of chronic disability. This review will attempt to summarize clinically relevant knowledge of the mechanisms of action of current FDA approved therapies for MS in the context of ongoing clinical trials of combination therapy and address rational approaches to changing therapy in a patient suspected to be 'unresponsive' to their current treatment. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: protein expression; treatment failure; clinical trial; review; side effect; clinical trials as topic; combined modality therapy; drug megadose; medical decision making; t lymphocyte; t-lymphocytes; cell population; b lymphocyte; b-lymphocytes; cytokines; acute leukemia; immune response; drug mechanism; cardiotoxicity; mitoxantrone; promyelocytic leukemia; cognition; natural killer cell; killer cells, natural; methylprednisolone; flu like syndrome; drug half life; monocytes; combination therapy; natalizumab; multiple sclerosis; beta interferon; chemokines; neuroprotection; cell adhesion molecule; mechanism of action; glatiramer acetate; interferon-beta
Journal Title: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume: 112
Issue: 7
ISSN: 0303-8467
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2010-09-01
Start Page: 583
End Page: 591
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.05.002
PUBMED: 20627553
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 1" - "Export Date: 20 April 2011" - "CODEN: CNNSB" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jerome Jeffrey Graber
    24 Graber