Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration-gated radiotherapy Journal Article


Authors: Yorke, E.; Rosenzweig, K. E.; Wagman, R.; Mageras, G. S.
Article Title: Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration-gated radiotherapy
Abstract: As quality assurance for respiration-gated treatments using the Varian RPM system, we monitor interfractional diaphragm variation throughout treatment using extra anterior-posterior (AP) portal images. We measure the superior-inferior (SI distance between one or more bony landmarks and the ipsilateral diaphragm dome in each such radiograph and calculate its difference, D, from the corresponding distance in a planning CT scan digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR). For each patient, the mean of D represents the systematic diaphragm displacement, and the standard deviation of D represents random diaphragm variations and is a measure of interfractional gating reproducibility. We present results for 31 sequential patients (21 lung, 10 liver tumors), each with at least 8 such portal images. For all patients, the gate included end-exhale. The patient-specific duty cycle ranged from 30% to 60%. All patients received customized audio prompting for simulation and treatment, and 14 patients also received visual prompting. Respiration-synchronized fluoroscopic movies taken at a conventional simulator revealed patient-specific diaphragm excursions from 1.0 cm to 5.0 cm and diaphragm excursion within the gate from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm, demonstrating a significant reduction of intra-fractional diaphragm (and by inference tumor) motion by respiratory gating. One standard deviation of the systematic displacement (the mean of D) was 0.63 cm and 0.48 cm for the lung and liver patient groups, respectively. The average +/-1 SD of the random displacements (i.e., the average of the standard deviations of D) was 0.42 +/- 0.11 cm and 0.50 +/- 0.19 for the two groups, respectively. The similar magnitude of the systematic and random displacements suggests that both derive from a common distribution of interfractional variations. Combining visual with audio prompting did not significantly improve performance, as judged by D. Guided by these portal images, field changes were made during the course of treatment for 6 patients (1 lung, 5 liver).
Keywords: clinical trial; methodology; sensitivity and specificity; neoplasm; neoplasms; reproducibility; reproducibility of results; health care quality; computer assisted diagnosis; radiation dose fractionation; quality assurance, health care; image quality; radiography; artifact; dose fractionation; motion; computer assisted radiotherapy; artifacts; radiographic image interpretation, computer-assisted; respiratory mechanics; breathing mechanics; radiographic image enhancement; radiotherapy, computer-assisted
Journal Title: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume: 6
Issue: 2
ISSN: 1526-9914
Publisher: American College of Medical Physics  
Date Published: 2005-01-01
Start Page: 19
End Page: 32
Language: English
PUBMED: 15940209
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC5723469
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 39" - "Export Date: 24 October 2012" - "Source: Scopus"
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Gikas S Mageras
    277 Mageras
  2. Ellen D Yorke
    450 Yorke