Is intraoperative frozen section analysis an efficient way to reduce positive surgical margins? Journal Article


Authors: Tsuboi, T.; Ohori, M.; Kuroiwa, K.; Reuter, V. E.; Kattan, M. W.; Eastham, J. A.; Scardino, P. T.
Article Title: Is intraoperative frozen section analysis an efficient way to reduce positive surgical margins?
Abstract: Objectives. To assess the accuracy and efficiency of frozen section analysis to detect positive surgical margins (+SMs) during radical prostatectomy. Methods. In a consecutive series of 760 patients treated with radical prostatectomy from 1998 to 2002, areas suspicious for +SMs on the surface of the removed prostate were examined by frozen section analysis. In a subset of 520 patients, the surgeon's level of suspicion for +SMs was scored and recorded during radical prostatectomy. Results. Overall, 259 patients underwent frozen section examination. Of these, 55 patients (21%) had +SMs on permanent section examination compared with 50 (10%) of 501 patients with no frozen section analysis (P <0.005). Cancer was present in 23 (8.9%) frozen section specimens, all of which were confirmed on permanent section analysis. Frozen section examination missed 32 +SMs in 236 patients with negative frozen section results. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of frozen section analysis to identify +SMs was 42%, 100%, 100%, and 86%, respectively. However, the sensitivity of frozen section analysis was much lower (23 of 105, 22%) when analyzed for the entire population, including those who did not have frozen section analysis. Among the subset of 520 patients with the level of suspicion recorded, 79 had a +SM on permanent section examination. However, 51 (64%) of these were in patients with no suspicious area in the prostatectomy specimen. Conclusions. Although the positive predictive value of frozen section analysis for +SMs is high, the sensitivity is too low to expect that a policy of routine frozen section analysis of suspicious areas will reduce the rate of +SMs substantially. © 2005 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; treatment outcome; aged; middle aged; surgical technique; major clinical study; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity and specificity; intraoperative care; reproducibility of results; prediction; prostate cancer; prostatic neoplasms; prostate; intraoperative period; prostatectomy; scoring system; intermethod comparison; frozen section; frozen sections
Journal Title: Urology
Volume: 66
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0090-4295
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2005-12-01
Start Page: 1287
End Page: 1291
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.073
PUBMED: 16360458
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 25" - "Export Date: 24 October 2012" - "CODEN: URGYA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kentaro Kuroiwa
    28 Kuroiwa
  2. Toshiki Tsuboi
    2 Tsuboi
  3. Peter T Scardino
    671 Scardino
  4. Makoto Ohori
    50 Ohori
  5. James Eastham
    539 Eastham
  6. Victor Reuter
    1228 Reuter
  7. Michael W Kattan
    218 Kattan