Economic outcomes of breast cancer survivorship: CALGB study 79804 Journal Article


Authors: Hensley, M. L.; Dowell, J.; Herndon, J. E. 2nd; Winer, E.; Stark, N.; Weeks, J. C.; Paskett, E.
Article Title: Economic outcomes of breast cancer survivorship: CALGB study 79804
Abstract: Background. Over 80 of women diagnosed with breast cancer will be survivors. We sought to determine the economic consequences of surviving breast cancer. Methods. Disease-free survivors who had received adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II breast cancer on CALGB study 8541 participated in a study of long-term outcomes. Survey responses were used to determine the types and frequency of medical resources used in follow-up, annual direct medical costs, and survivor perceptions of the personal economic impact of breast cancer. Results. 245 of 314 (78%) invited breast cancer survivors (median follow-up 12.2 years, range 9.3-16.4) completed the surveys. Eighty-seven percent reported having cancer specialist follow-up in the past year. The following percentages of survivors reported having had, for breast cancer follow-up, at least once in the past year: breast examination 92%, mammogram 88, bone scan 18%, chest radiograph 59%, tumor marker studies 37%. When follow-up care included a medical oncologist, resources were more likely to be used at least according to published follow-up guidelines, or over-used. Median annual cost of follow-up per survivor was $630 (range $0-10,817) with higher costs associated with medical oncology follow-up, lower income, and younger age. Few women reported a negative impact of breast cancer on employment, but 16% reported being denied life insurance. Conclusions. Among long-term breast cancer survivors, patient self-report data suggest that over-use of medical resources for follow-up appears common. When follow-up care included a medical oncologist, resources were more likely to be used appropriately, or over-used. Costs of follow-up are higher with medical oncology follow-up, lower income and among younger survivors. The annual cost of follow-up varies widely and may be driven by over-use of follow-up tests. © Springer 2005.
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; controlled study; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; survival rate; major clinical study; united states; disease marker; cancer adjuvant therapy; follow up; follow-up studies; cancer grading; echomammography; health survey; practice guideline; breast neoplasms; tumor marker; outcome assessment (health care); survivors; cost effectiveness analysis; health care cost; health insurance; health services; cancer cytodiagnosis; breast carcinoma; breast examination; medical specialist; thorax radiography; age distribution; analysis of variance; cost of illness; statistics, nonparametric; bone scintiscanning; costs and cost analysis; lowest income group; employment; insurance coverage; costs and cost analyses; outcomes assessment
Journal Title: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume: 91
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0167-6806
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2005-05-01
Start Page: 153
End Page: 161
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-004-6497-9
PUBMED: 15868443
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 24" - "Export Date: 24 October 2012" - "CODEN: BCTRD" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Martee L Hensley
    289 Hensley