Real-world analysis of cost, health care resource utilization, and supportive care in Hodgkin lymphoma patients with frontline failure Journal Article


Authors: Bonafede, M.; Feliciano, J.; Cai, Q.; Noxon, V.; Princic, N.; Richhariya, A.; Straus, D. J.
Article Title: Real-world analysis of cost, health care resource utilization, and supportive care in Hodgkin lymphoma patients with frontline failure
Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic burden of frontline failure (FLF) among classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients during and after treatment. Patients and methods: The population consisted of adult HL patients identified from January 2010 through September 2015 without any other primary cancer prior to HL diagnosis, who also had a frontline (FL) regimen indicative of curative intent. Patients were characterized as FLF (those who restart, switch to any chemotherapy; had a hematopoietic stem cell transplant; or newly initiated radiation therapy [RT] after discontinuing FL) or non-FLF (those not considered as FLF). Direct health care utilization and expenditures were measured over both fixed and variable length follow-up periods and during FL therapy. Results: There were 77 FLF and 602 non-FLF patients who met the final inclusion criteria. FLF and non-FLF patients were demographically similar with mean age 38.5 years and 47.5% females. Average per patient per month (PPPM) costs were significantly higher for FLF patients during all follow-up (US$20,266 vs US$7,772, P<0.05). Annual total expenditures were significantly higher among FLF patients (US$198,388) vs non-FLF patients (US$37,549). FLF (vs non-FLF) patients had a significantly shorter duration of FL therapy (116 vs 131 days, P=0.024) and higher total PPPM expenditures during FL (US$29,040 vs US$16,369, P<0.05). Annual cost varied by failure type with those who failed due to restart incurring the highest cost (US$269,189) and those who switched incurring the lowest cost (US$46,951). FLF patients had a significantly greater utilization in every health care resource category during follow-up. Conclusion: FLF (vs non-FLF) patients utilized substantially more health care resources and incurred a substantially higher economic burden. Over 5 years, FLF patients with at least two lines of treatment were projected to incur US$535,846 of health care costs. Further research is needed to determine optimal treatment that could reduce the risk of progression, need for treatment after FL, and enhance long-term clinical and economic outcomes. © 2018 Bonafede et al.
Keywords: treatment failure; hodgkin lymphoma; retrospective analysis; health care outcomes; administrative claims database
Journal Title: Clinicoeconomics and Outcomes Research
Volume: 10
ISSN: 1178-6981
Publisher: Dove Medical Press Ltd  
Date Published: 2018-01-01
Start Page: 629
End Page: 641
Language: English
DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s178649
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC6198880
PUBMED: 30410373
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 February 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. David J Straus
    356 Straus