Identification of patient groups at highest risk from traditional approach to ovarian cancer treatment Journal Article


Authors: Aletti, G. D.; Eisenhauer, E. L.; Santillan, A.; Axtell, A.; Aletti, G.; Holschneider, C.; Chi, D. S.; Bristow, R. E.; Cliby, W. A.
Article Title: Identification of patient groups at highest risk from traditional approach to ovarian cancer treatment
Abstract: Objective: Define subgroups of patients at highest risk for major morbidity and mortality after a traditional approach of maximal surgical efforts followed by chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). Methods: Preoperative health, intra-operative findings and outcomes were assessed in consecutive patients with primary AOC from 4 centers. Initial tumor dissemination was stratified into 3 groups based on volume of disease. Surgery was categorized using a previously described surgical complexity score (SCS). Statistical analysis was directed toward validating a multivariable risk-adjusted model. Results: 576 patients with stage IIIC (N = 447, 77.6%) or IV AOC (N = 129, 22.4%) were analyzed. Age (HR (per year): 1.02; 95%CI: 1.01-1.03), high tumor dissemination (HTD) (HR: 1.73; 95%CI: 1.19-2.56), residual disease (RD) > 1 cm (HR: 2.46; 95%CI: 1.74-3.53), and stage IV (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.51-2.45), independently correlated with OS. We identified a small subgroup of patients who comprised a high-risk group (N = 38, 6.6%) characterized by all of the following characteristics: high initial tumor dissemination (HTD) or stage IV plus poor performance or nutritional status plus age ≥ 75. In this group, high SCS to achieve low RD was associated with morbidity of 63.6% and limited survival benefit. Conclusions: Optimal management of AOC requires accurate, risk-adjusted predictors of outcomes allowing a tailored approach starting with primary therapy. Complex surgical procedures to render low RD improve survival, and in the majority of cases, the benefits of such surgery appear to outweigh the morbidity. However careful analysis identifies a subgroup of patients in whom an alternative approach may be the better strategy. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; aged; major clinical study; advanced cancer; validation process; cancer patient; cancer staging; nutritional status; ovarian cancer; accuracy; ovary cancer; morbidity; cancer mortality; high risk patient; age; preoperative period; minimal residual disease; intraoperative period; prognostic factors; scoring system; surgery; risk adjusted model; tumor load; surgical complexity score
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 120
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2011-01-01
Start Page: 23
End Page: 28
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.09.010
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 20933255
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 4 March 2011" - "CODEN: GYNOA" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Dennis S Chi
    707 Chi