Adjuvant sunitinib for high-risk renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: Subgroup analyses and updated overall survival results Journal Article


Authors: Motzer, R. J.; Ravaud, A.; Patard, J. J.; Pandha, H. S.; George, D. J.; Patel, A.; Chang, Y. H.; Escudier, B.; Donskov, F.; Magheli, A.; Carteni, G.; Laguerre, B.; Tomczak, P.; Breza, J.; Gerletti, P.; Lechuga, M.; Lin, X.; Casey, M.; Serfass, L.; Pantuck, A. J.; Staehler, M.
Article Title: Adjuvant sunitinib for high-risk renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: Subgroup analyses and updated overall survival results
Abstract: Background Adjuvant sunitinib significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) versus placebo in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.98; p = 0.03). Objective To report the relationship between baseline factors and DFS, pattern of recurrence, and updated overall survival (OS). Design, setting, and participants Data for 615 patients randomized to sunitinib (n = 309) or placebo (n = 306) in the S-TRAC trial. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Subgroup DFS analyses by baseline risk factors were conducted using a Cox proportional hazards model. Baseline risk factors included: modified University of California Los Angeles integrated staging system criteria, age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), weight, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Fuhrman grade. Results and limitations Of 615 patients, 97 and 122 in the sunitinib and placebo arms developed metastatic disease, with the most common sites of distant recurrence being lung (40 and 49), lymph node (21 and 26), and liver (11 and 14), respectively. A benefit of adjuvant sunitinib over placebo was observed across subgroups, including: higher risk (T3, no or undetermined nodal involvement, Fuhrman grade ≥2, ECOG PS ≥1, T4 and/or nodal involvement; hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.99; p = 0.04), NLR ≤3 (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54–0.95; p = 0.02), and Fuhrman grade 3/4 (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.98; p = 0.04). All subgroup analyses were exploratory, and no adjustments for multiplicity were made. Median OS was not reached in either arm (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66–1.28; p = 0.6); 67 and 74 patients died in the sunitinib and placebo arms, respectively. Conclusions A benefit of adjuvant sunitinib over placebo was observed across subgroups. The results are consistent with the primary analysis, which showed a benefit for adjuvant sunitinib in patients at high risk of recurrent RCC after nephrectomy. Patient summary Most subgroups of patients at high risk of recurrent renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy experienced a clinical benefit with adjuvant sunitinib. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00375674. Further to the positive outcome in the overall S-TRAC population, most subgroups defined by baseline characteristics demonstrated longer disease-free survival on sunitinib versus placebo, including patients with a higher risk of recurrence than the overall population, and patients with Fuhrman grade 3/4. © 2017 European Association of Urology
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; controlled study; aged; disease-free survival; middle aged; cancer surgery; major clinical study; overall survival; cancer recurrence; postoperative period; placebo; sunitinib; cancer risk; drug dose reduction; drug withdrawal; treatment duration; cancer adjuvant therapy; disease free survival; cancer staging; outcome assessment; follow up; lymph node metastasis; multiple cycle treatment; randomized controlled trial; body weight; relapse; risk factor; renal cell carcinoma; nephrectomy; age; europe; liver metastasis; lung metastasis; proportional hazards model; death; multicenter study; recurrent disease; sex difference; asia; adjuvant; western hemisphere; human; male; female; priority journal; article; neutrophil lymphocyte ratio
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 73
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2018-01-01
Start Page: 62
End Page: 68
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.09.008
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 28967554
PMCID: PMC6684251
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 January 2018 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Motzer
    1243 Motzer