Accuracy of telomerase in estimating breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis Journal Article


Authors: Winnikow, E. P.; Medeiros, L. R.; Edelweiss, M. I.; Rosa, D. D.; Edelweiss, M.; Simões, P. W.; Silva, F. R.; Silva, B. R.; Rosa, M. I.
Article Title: Accuracy of telomerase in estimating breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract: Objective: To determine the accuracy of telomerase activity in predicting a higher risk for breast cancer. Study design: A quantitative systematic review was performed. Studies that detected telomerase activities in breast tissue were included. Results: Twenty-five primary studies were analyzed, which included 2395 breast lesions. The proportion of breast cancer was 60.8%. Eighty-two percent (1193/1455) of breast cancer cases and 18% (169/940) of benign lesions cases were positive for telomerase activity. For breast cancer vs benign or normal breast tissue, the pooled likelihood ratio for the presence of telomerase activity was 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-6.5) and the post-test probability was 88% (95% CI, 83-91). For breast cancer vs benign or normal tissue, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.89 with the Q* point value of 0.82. Conclusion: Our systematic review showed that telomerase activity was significantly present in breast cancer when compared with normal breast tissue or benign breast lesions. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords: review; cancer risk; sensitivity and specificity; accuracy; breast cancer; enzyme activity; telomerase; systematic review; probability; diagnosis; benign tumor; predictive value; breast lesion; receiver operating characteristic; meta-analysis; telomerase activity; breast lesions
Journal Title: Breast
Volume: 21
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0960-9776
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2012-02-01
Start Page: 1
End Page: 7
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.08.136
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 21911295
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Export Date: 1 March 2012" - "CODEN: BREAE" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Marcia Edelweiss
    104 Edelweiss