Redundancy-weighted FDK reconstruction for dual-detector combined-scanning CBCT: Practical implementation for image guided particle therapy Journal Article


Authors: Song, B.; Whitaker, T. J.; Gautam, A. S.; Olberg, S.; Choi, B.; Lee, S. U.; Jeong, J. H.; Kim, J.; Liang, X.; Tan, J.
Article Title: Redundancy-weighted FDK reconstruction for dual-detector combined-scanning CBCT: Practical implementation for image guided particle therapy
Abstract: Background: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is essential for image-guided particle therapy (IGPT), providing daily patient positioning, anatomical monitoring, and treatment verification. However, conventional single-detector CBCT suffers from poor soft-tissue contrast, long acquisition times, and motion artifacts, reducing its effectiveness for adaptive radiotherapy workflows. Addressing these challenges requires an advanced CBCT reconstruction approach capable of enhancing image quality while reducing scan time and radiation exposure. Purpose: This study introduces a Dual Detector Combined Scanning (DDCS) CBCT reconstruction algorithm to overcome conventional CBCT limitations. By integrating a dual-source, orthogonal imaging setup, DDCS significantly reduces scanning time and imaging artifacts. A modified Parker-weighting algorithm further improves image reconstruction accuracy, ensuring high-fidelity visualization. The goal is to enhance adaptive radiotherapy by improving real-time patient positioning, dose verification, and motion management. Methods: A dual-detector CBCT system was designed to acquire orthogonal projections simultaneously, reducing scan time and improving data completeness. A modified Parker-weighting algorithm corrected angular overlap distortions, ensuring better reconstruction accuracy. The system was evaluated using numerical and physical phantom studies to assess spatial resolution, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and artifact reduction. Additionally, a dynamic phantom simulated respiratory motion, validating motion robustness for adaptive radiotherapy. Performance was compared against single-detector CBCT, focusing on image fidelity, noise suppression, and computational efficiency. Results: DDCS-CBCT demonstrated higher CNR, reduced motion artifacts, and improved spatial resolution, leading to more accurate anatomical visualization. The system's efficiency enables faster, more reliable patient setup in IGPT while maintaining a lower imaging dose. Conclusion: The proposed DDCS-CBCT approach significantly improves imaging accuracy, reduces scan time, and enhances real-time volumetric guidance in IGRT/IGPT. These findings support the clinical feasibility of the DDCS system and its integration into online adaptive radiotherapy workflows. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords: controlled study; radiotherapy; patient monitoring; algorithms; radiation exposure; algorithm; image enhancement; computerized tomography; geometry; image quality; polystyrene; phantoms, imaging; image processing, computer-assisted; image processing; patient positioning; visualization; reconstruction; artifact reduction; image reconstruction; respiratory mechanics; cone beam computed tomography; image-guided; cone-beam computed tomography; phantoms; noise reduction; cbct; data visualization; rotation; image guided radiotherapy; devices; procedures; point spread function; adaptive radiotherapy; modulation transfer function; radiotherapy, image-guided; fourier transform; motion artifact; imaging phantom; contrast to noise ratio; humans; human; article; image resolution; particle therapy; image artifact; reconstruction algorithm; computational efficiency; data completeness; scan time; work-flows; dual detector; catphan 600; dual-detectors; dual detector combined scanning; feldkamp davis kress algorithm
Journal Title: Medical Physics
Volume: 52
Issue: 8
ISSN: 00942405
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.  
Date Published: 2025-01-01
Start Page: e17996
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/mp.17996
PUBMED: 40781831
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics