Invasive lobular carcinoma: Strategies and perspectives from the lobular breast cancer research group Review


Authors: Corso, G.; Shen, S.; Criscitiello, C.; Mukhtar, R.; Gamble, L.; Rocco, E. G.; Pesapane, F.; Nicosia, L.; Jhaveri, K.; Salimbeni, B. T.; Massari, G.; Meduri, E.; Margherita De Scalzi, A.; Concardi, A.; Magnoni, F.; Mamtani, A.; Pareja, F.; Leonardi, M. C.; Sacchini, V.; Bogani, G.; La Vecchia, C.; Presti, D.; Colleoni, M. A.; Veronesi, P.; Robson, M. E.
Review Title: Invasive lobular carcinoma: Strategies and perspectives from the lobular breast cancer research group
Abstract: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) represents approximately 10–15% of all breast cancers and is defined by a unique discohesive morphology due to loss of E-cadherin. Despite its prevalence, ILC has been historically underrepresented in clinical and translational research, contributing to diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic uncertainties. This narrative review, conducted by the Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Research Group, synthesizes current evidence on ILC with expert perspectives to inform future research and clinical strategies. We highlight the distinct biology of ILC, including characteristic genomic alterations (e.g., CDH1, PIK3CA, ERBB2 mutations) and its relationship with endocrine sensitivity and limited immune infiltration. Diagnostic challenges are underscored by ILC's subtle imaging presentation and underestimation of tumor extent on mammography and ultrasound, with MRI and contrast-enhanced mammography offering improved accuracy. The review discusses evolving surgical approaches, axillary staging considerations, and radiotherapy strategies, with an emphasis on adapting techniques to ILC's infiltrative growth. Endocrine therapy remains central for hormone receptor–positive ILC, with emerging evidence supporting CDK4/6 inhibitors and extended endocrine therapy in high-risk cases. Investigational therapies targeting ILC-enriched mutations and synthetic lethality mechanisms (e.g., ROS1 inhibition in CDH1-deficient tumors) hold promise for personalized treatment. This comprehensive review identifies knowledge gaps and advocates for histology-specific clinical trials, biomarker-driven treatment strategies, and tailored imaging and surgical techniques to improve outcomes for patients with ILC. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords: cancer chemotherapy; cancer surgery; somatic mutation; review; systemic therapy; neoadjuvant therapy; cancer staging; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; outcome assessment; antineoplastic agent; cancer diagnosis; evidence based medicine; cell infiltration; mastectomy; surgical approach; uvomorulin; cancer research; risk factor; cancer hormone therapy; mammography; echography; contrast medium; cancer epidemiology; genetic predisposition; endocrine therapy; lifestyle; e-cadherin; neoadjuvant treatment; molecular pathology; breast-conserving surgery; germline mutation; experimental therapy; human; hormone receptor positive breast cancer; precision oncology; personalized cancer therapy; knowledge gap; digital breast tomosynthesis; contrast enhanced mammography; invasive lobular breast carcinoma; invasive lobular carcinoma (ilc); atirmociclib
Journal Title: Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume: 140
ISSN: 0305-7372
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2025-11-01
Start Page: 103001
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2025.103001
PUBMED: 40815983
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mark E Robson
    682 Robson
  2. Virgilio Sacchini
    148 Sacchini
  3. Komal Lachhman Jhaveri
    219 Jhaveri
  4. Anita   Mamtani
    67 Mamtani
  5. Sherry Shen
    27 Shen
  6. Lauren Ann Gamble
    1 Gamble