Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: The phase III, randomized LEAP-015 study Journal Article


Authors: Shitara, K.; Lorenzen, S.; Li, J.; Bai, Y. X.; Fernández, M. G.; Aguilar, M.; Shoji, H.; Reyes-Cosmelli, F.; Peña, Y. R.; Corrales, L.; Wyrwicz, L.; Eyzaguirre, D. A.; Pan, Y. Y.; Ryu, M. H.; Cohen, D. J.; Wainberg, Z. A.; Ku, G.; Tabernero, J.; Van Cutsem, E.; Qin, S. K.; Oh, D. Y.; Xu, J. M.; Liang, L. W.; Bordia, S.; Bhagia, P.; Rha, S. Y.; onbehalf of the LEAP-015 Investigators
Article Title: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: The phase III, randomized LEAP-015 study
Abstract: Purpose The phase III randomized open-label LEAP-015 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04662710) evaluated first-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods Eligible participants 18 years and older with untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to induction with oral lenvatinib 8 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 400 mg intravenously once every 6 weeks (x2) and investigators' choice of capecitabine and oxaliplatin once every 3 weeks (x4) or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin once every 2 weeks (x6) and consolidation with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, or chemotherapy. Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in participants with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) >= 1 and all participants. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Results Of 880 participants randomly assigned, 443 received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 437 received chemotherapy. The median follow-ups were 32.2 months (range, 19.0-41.7) in participants with PD-L1 CPS >= 1 and 31.8 months (19.0-41.7) in all participants. At interim analysis, PFS was statistically significant with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in participants with PD-L1 CPS >= 1 (median, 7.3 v 6.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.9]; P = .0012) and all participants (median, 7.2 v 7.0 months; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.92]; P = .0019). The ORR was 59.5% versus 45.4% in participants with PD-L1 CPS >= 1 and 58.0% versus 43.9% in all participants, P < .0001 for both. At final analysis, OS was not statistically significant in participants with PD-L1 CPS >= 1 (median, 12.6 v 12.9 months; HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00]; P = .0244; P value boundary = .0204). Grade >= 3 drug-related adverse event rates were 65% versus 49%. Conclusion Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy provided a statistically significant improvement in PFS in advanced unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal carcinoma at interim analysis although the clinical significance of this difference seems to be limited. No significant improvement occurred in OS in participants with PD-L1 CPS >= 1.
Keywords: therapy; double-blind; advanced gastric-cancer; 1st-line; open-label; junction
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 43
Issue: 22
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2025-08-01
Start Page: 2502
End Page: 2514
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:001534396300001
DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-00748
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC12288889
PUBMED: 40448579
Notes: Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Geoffrey Yuyat Ku
    235 Ku