First-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial Journal Article


Authors: Marth, C.; Moore, R. G.; Bidzinski, M.; Pignata, S.; Ayhan, A.; Rubio, M. J.; Beiner, M.; Hall, M.; Vulsteke, C.; Braicu, E. I.; Sonoda, K.; Wu, X. H.; Frentzas, S.; Mattar, A.; Lheureux, S.; Chen, X. J.; Hasegawa, K.; Magallanes-Maciel, M.; Choi, C. H.; Shalkova, M.; Kaen, D.; Wang, P. H.; Berger, R.; Okpara, C. E.; McKenzie, J.; Yao, L. L.; Orlowski, R.; Khemka, V.; Gilbert, L.; Makker, V.
Article Title: First-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial
Abstract: PURPOSELenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (len + pembro) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (aEC) in the phase III Study 309/KEYNOTE-775. We report results from the phase III, randomized, open-label European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial-en9/LEAP-001 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03884101) that evaluated len + pembro versus chemotherapy in first-line aEC.METHODSPatients with stage III to IV or recurrent, radiographically apparent EC and no previous chemotherapy or disease progression >= 6 months after neo/adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min once every 3 weeks. Primary end points were PFS and OS, evaluated in the mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) and all-comers populations. Noninferiority was assessed for OS at final analysis (FA) for len + pembro versus chemotherapy (multiplicity-adjusted, one-sided nominal alpha, .0159; null hypothesis-tested hazard ratio [HR], 1.1).RESULTSEight hundred forty-two patients were randomly assigned (len + pembro, n = 420 [pMMR population, n = 320]; chemotherapy, n = 422 [pMMR population, n = 322]). At FA (data cutoff, October 2, 2023), median PFS (95% CI) in the pMMR population was 9.6 (8.2 to 11.9) versus 10.2 (8.4 to 10.5) months with len + pembro versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.21]) and among all-comers was 12.5 (10.3 to 15.1) versus 10.2 (8.4 to 10.4) months (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.09]; descriptive analyses). Median OS (95% CI) in the pMMR population was 30.9 (25.4 to 37.7) versus 29.4 (26.2 to 35.4) months with len + pembro versus chemotherapy (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.26]; noninferiority P = .246, not statistically significant per multiplicity control strategy) and among all-comers was 37.7 (32.2 to 43.6) versus 32.1 (27.2 to 35.7) months (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.12]). Grade >= 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 331/420 (79%) versus 274/411 (67%) treated patients.CONCLUSIONFirst-line len + pembro did not meet prespecified statistical criteria for PFS or OS versus chemotherapy in pMMR aEC.
Keywords: safety; efficacy
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 43
Issue: 9
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2025-03-20
Start Page: 1083
End Page: 1100
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:001450110000015
DOI: 10.1200/jco-24-01326
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC11936476
PUBMED: 39591551
Notes: Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Vicky Makker
    263 Makker