Patient characteristics associated with conventional schedule vs. dose dense chemotherapy in women with stage I–IIIA breast cancer Journal Article


Authors: Bhimani, J.; Wang, P.; Gallagher, G. B.; O’Connell, K.; Persaud, S.; Blinder, V. S.; Burganowski, R.; Ergas, I. J.; Griggs, J. J.; Heon, N.; Kolevska, T.; Kotsurovskyy, Y.; Kroenke, C. H.; Laurent, C. A.; Liu, R.; Nakata, K. G.; Roh, J. M.; Tabatabai, S.; Valice, E.; Bandera, E. V.; Aiello Bowles, E. J.; Kushi, L. H.; Kantor, E. D.
Article Title: Patient characteristics associated with conventional schedule vs. dose dense chemotherapy in women with stage I–IIIA breast cancer
Abstract: Introduction: Compared to conventional chemotherapy schedules, use of dose-dense chemotherapy, which refers to administration of chemotherapy at standard doses with reduced cycle lengths, is known to improve survival, although may confer greater toxicity risk. We evaluated the patient factors associated with use of conventional vs. dose-dense chemotherapy administration schedules. Methods: Analyses include 4685 women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy between 2005 and 2019 for Stage I–IIIA breast cancer at Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Washington. Among women treated with drug combinations for which dose-dense administration schedules were observed, we used generalized linear models of the Poisson family with a log-link function to calculate prevalence ratios (PRatios) for the associations between patient factors and use of conventional vs. dose-dense administration schedules. Results: Several factors were associated with receipt of conventional administration schedule, including older age (PRatio75+vs. 18–39: 2.97; 95% CI 2.35–3.75; p-trend < 0.001), renal impairment (PRatio: 1.55; 95% CI 1.11–2.17), and HER2+ status (PRatio: 1.50; 95% CI 1.38–1.62), among others. Factors associated with a lower likelihood of receipt of a conventional regimen schedule include: higher median household income (PRatioQ4 vs. Q1 0.73; 95% CI 0.67–0.80; p-trend < 0.001), diagnosis in later years (PRatio:2012–19 vs. 2005–11 0.44; 95% CI 0.41–0.48), and higher stage (PRatiostage IIIA vs. stage I: 0.51; 95% CI 0.46–0.58; p-trend < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients receiving conventional schedule vs. dose-dense chemotherapy represent those typically most vulnerable to toxicity or with lower risk disease, but may also represent groups vulnerable to disparities. Further research is needed to establish how to improve the uptake of dose-dense chemotherapy where appropriate. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025.
Keywords: adolescent; adult; controlled study; aged; middle aged; young adult; major clinical study; neutropenia; doxorubicin; paclitaxel; chemotherapy, adjuvant; cancer staging; outcome assessment; antineoplastic agent; neoplasm staging; breast cancer; thrombocytopenia; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; drug administration schedule; cyclophosphamide; kidney failure; pathology; breast neoplasms; risk; alanine aminotransferase; alkaline phosphatase; aspartate aminotransferase; bilirubin; liver failure; body mass; neutrophil; adjuvant chemotherapy; breast tumor; drug administration; drug therapy; toxicity; trastuzumab; creatinine clearance; platelet count; procedures; estrogen receptor positive breast cancer; dose densification; humans; human; female; article; sociodemographics; progesterone receptor positive breast cancer; household income
Journal Title: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume: 213
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0167-6806
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2025-08-01
Start Page: 115
End Page: 126
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-025-07764-w
PUBMED: 40618298
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC12289320
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Victoria Susana Blinder
    116 Blinder
  2. Narre Heon
    17 Heon
  3. Elizabeth David Kantor
    45 Kantor
  4. Jenna Bhimani
    18 Bhimani
  5. Sonia Persaud
    25 Persaud
  6. Peng Wang
    10 Wang