Phase II (Alliance A091802) randomized trial of avelumab plus cetuximab versus avelumab alone in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Zandberg, D. P.; Allred, J. B.; Rosenberg, A. J.; Kaczmar, J. M.; Swiecicki, P.; Julian, R. A.; Poklepovic, A. S.; Bauman, J. R.; Phan, M. D.; Saba, N. F.; Rivera, E.; Rowland, K.; Davar, D.; Cordes, J.; Ho, A. L.; Zhang, M.; Berg, S. A.; Munster, P. N.; Schwartz, G. K.
Article Title: Phase II (Alliance A091802) randomized trial of avelumab plus cetuximab versus avelumab alone in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Abstract: PURPOSEContinued improvement in outcomes is needed for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).MethodsAlliance A091802 is a randomized phase II trial of avelumab (800 mg IV once every 2 weeks) plus cetuximab (500 mg/m2 IV once every 2 weeks) versus avelumab alone once every 2 weeks for up to 2 years. Cetuximab was given for 1 year in the avelumab + cetuximab arm. Crossover at progression to avelumab + cetuximab was allowed. Randomization was 1:1, stratified by PD-L1 and HIV status. Patients had distant metastatic or unresectable locally advanced cSCC, were anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody-naive, had no previous cetuximab in the advanced setting, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and could be HIV+ (CD4 >200, viral load <200). Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, immunosuppression, or active autoimmune diseases were excluded. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS; null hypothesis: median = 12 months v alternative hypothesis: 21 months or a 75% improvement, power of 80% with one-sided alpha.2, n = 57, 37 PFS events required). Secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rates (ORRs), clinical benefit rate, and toxicity.RESULTSSixty patients were enrolled; 57 patients were evaluable. The median age was 72 years, all were HIV-; 75.4% was PD-L1+, 84.2% had head/neck origin, 47.4% had distant metastasis, and there were no differences in baseline characteristics by arm. Avelumab + cetuximab significantly improved PFS versus avelumab (median, 11.1 [7.6-not reached (NR)] v 3.0 months [2.7-13.6] hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.97], P =.018). Avelumab patients who crossed over (n = 9) to combination had a median PFS after crossover of 11.3 months (5.8-NR). The confirmed ORR was 27.6% with avelumab + cetuximab and 21.4% with avelumab. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 48.3% and 21.5% of patients with avelumab + cetuximab (most common: rash [20.7%], infusion reaction [20.7%]) and avelumab, respectively.CONCLUSIONAvelumab + cetuximab significantly improved PFS versus avelumab alone in patients with advanced cSCC. Alliance A091802 supports a larger confirmatory study with the combination of cetuximab and PD-1:PD-(L)1 blockade. © 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Publication status: Online ahead of print
Date Published: 2025-05-31
Online Publication Date: 2025-05-31
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco-25-00759
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 40448574
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Alan Loh Ho
    240 Ho