Genomic landscape of adenocarcinomas across the gastroesophageal junction moving on from the Siewert classification Journal Article


Authors: Nakauchi, M.; Walch, H. S.; Nussenzweig, S.; Carr, R.; Vos, E.; Berger, M. F.; Schultz, N.; Janjigian, Y.; Wu, A.; Tang, L.; Shah, P.; Jones, D. R.; Coit, D.; Strong, V. E.; Molena, D.; Sihag, S.
Article Title: Genomic landscape of adenocarcinomas across the gastroesophageal junction moving on from the Siewert classification
Abstract: Objective: To investigate how the Siewert classification of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas correlates with genomic profiles. Background: Current staging and treatment guidelines recommend that tumors with an epicenter <2 cm into the gastric cardia be treated as esophageal cancers, whereas tumors with an epicenter >2 cm into the cardia be staged and treated as gastric cancers. To date, however, few studies have compared the genomic profiles of the 3 Siewert classification groups to validate this distinction. Methods: Using targeted tumor sequencing data on patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction previously treated with surgery at our institution, we compared genomic features across Siewert classification groups. Results: A total of 350 patients were included: 121 had Siewert type I, 170 type II, and 59 type III. Comparisons by Siewert location revealed that Siewert types I and II were primarily characterized as the chromosomal instability molecular subtype and displayed Barrett metaplasia and p53 and cell cycle pathway dysregulation. Siewert type III tumors, by contrast, were more heterogeneous, including higher proportions of microsatellite instability and genomically stable tumors, and more frequently displayed ARID1A and somatic CDH1 alterations, signet ring cell features, and poor differentiation. Overall, Siewert type I and II tumors demonstrated greater genomic overlap with lower esophageal tumors, whereas Siewert type III tumors shared genomic features with gastric tumors. Conclusions: Overall, our results support recent updates in treatment and staging guidelines. Ultimately, however, molecular rather than anatomic classification may prove more valuable in determining staging, treatment, and prognosis. Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: aged; middle aged; genetics; cancer staging; neoplasm staging; adenocarcinoma; classification; pathology; genomics; stomach neoplasms; esophagus tumor; esophageal neoplasms; stomach tumor; esophagogastric junction; gastroesophageal junction; siewert classification; humans; human; male; female
Journal Title: Annals of Surgery
Volume: 281
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0003-4932
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2025-06-01
Start Page: 989
End Page: 996
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006363
PUBMED: 38841851
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11621229
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Corresponding authors is MSK author: Vivian E. Strong, Daniela Molena, Smita Sihag -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Yelena Yuriy Janjigian
    395 Janjigian
  2. Abraham Jing-Ching Wu
    401 Wu
  3. Laura Hong Tang
    447 Tang
  4. Vivian Strong
    265 Strong
  5. Daniel Coit
    542 Coit
  6. Michael Forman Berger
    765 Berger
  7. Nikolaus D Schultz
    487 Schultz
  8. Pari Mayank Shah
    47 Shah
  9. David Randolph Jones
    417 Jones
  10. Daniela   Molena
    272 Molena
  11. Smita Sihag
    96 Sihag
  12. Rebecca Ann Carr
    22 Carr
  13. Henry Stuart Walch
    100 Walch
  14. Elvira Lise Vos
    26 Vos