Comparative analysis of intracranial response assessment criteria in patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with combination nivolumab 1 ipilimumab in CheckMate 204 Journal Article


Authors: Huang, R. Y.; Youssef, G.; Nelson, T.; Wen, P. Y.; Forsyth, P.; Hodi, F. S.; Margolin, K.; Algazi, A. P.; Hamid, O.; Lao, C. D.; Ernstoff, M. S.; Moschos, S. J.; Atkins, M. B.; Postow, M. A.; Reardon, D. A.; Grootendorst, D. J.; Leung, D.; Askelson, M.; Ritchings, C.; Tawbi, H. A.
Article Title: Comparative analysis of intracranial response assessment criteria in patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with combination nivolumab 1 ipilimumab in CheckMate 204
Abstract: PURPOSE In CheckMate 204, nivolumab 1 ipilimumab showed high intracranial (IC) objective response rates (icORRs) in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). Using icORR as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) has prompted use of alternate response criteria. To set the stage for harmonized MBM trials, the aim of this exploratory analysis was to determine icORR using several response criteria and examine correlations of response with survival. METHODS Patients (N 5 119) with ≥one unirradiated MBMs received nivolumab 1 ipilimumab every 3 weeks (four doses), followed by nivolumab every 2 weeks for ≤24 months. Blinded review icORR was assessed with modified RECIST (mRECIST), Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM; 5 mm and 10 mm cutoffs), and volumetric criteria (5 mm and 10 mm). Using a 6-week response landmark, IC progression-free survival (icPFS) and OS were compared for responders versus nonresponders. RESULTS icORR was higher with mRECIST and volumetric criteria than with RANO-BM or RECIST. mRECIST and volumetric response also showed stronger correlations with icPFS and OS. mRECIST responders who were RANO-BM 5 mm nonresponders (n 5 14) had similar OS to RANO-BM 5 mm responders (n 5 41). Clinical deterioration affected RANO-BM icORR; however, when assessed only radiographically without deterioration, RANO-BM 5 mm performed similarly to mRECIST. Among 41 patients with target lesions all <10 mm, responder icPFS and OS were similar to those of responders in the total population, indicating that response could be accurately determined in these patients. CONCLUSION This analysis supports mRECIST or radiographic-only RANO-BM 5 mm as reliable assessment scales in MBM trials. Volumetric response correlated with survival, supporting its application in future trials. Response could be accurately determined in patients with MBMs all <10 mm, supporting the inclusion of patients with MBMs ≥5 mm in future trials. © 2025 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; controlled study; treatment response; aged; middle aged; major clinical study; overall survival; clinical trial; mortality; monotherapy; comparative study; gadolinium; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; brain tumor; follow up; brain neoplasms; antineoplastic agent; ipilimumab; melanoma; progression free survival; randomized controlled trial; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; pathology; contrast enhancement; multicenter study; phase 3 clinical trial; kaplan meier method; drug therapy; progression-free survival; deterioration; phase 2 clinical trial (topic); multicenter study (topic); response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; nivolumab; humans; human; male; female; article; ecog performance status; melanoma brain metastasis; intracranial objective response rate; response assessment in neuro oncology brain metastases
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 43
Issue: 10
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2025-04-01
Start Page: 1210
End Page: 1218
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00953
PUBMED: 39752606
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11949218
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Michael Andrew Postow
    361 Postow