| Abstract: |
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the current U.S. practice patterns of analgesia (AG) and anesthesia (AS) for gynecologic brachytherapy (BT) procedures. Methods and Materials: A 27-item survey created with expertise from 5 brachytherapists was distributed electronically to 90 U.S. radiation oncology academic programs and publicized on social media and at 2 national meetings from June to October 2023. Results: Forty-one responses were received (46%). Fifty-four percent identified as female, 66% as Caucasian, and 85% as non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Forty-nine percent use a BT suite ± computed tomography (CT) simulator alone, 39% the operating room ± BT suite or CT simulator or other location, 10% CT simulation room alone, and 2% clinic examination room. Thirty-four percent use general anesthesia alone (GA) for intracavitary BT (n = 41), 20% conscious sedation (CS) alone, 10% oral analgesia (OA) alone, 9% spinal or epidural AS alone, and 27% combination. Among those performing hybrid BT (n = 25), 40% use GA alone, 16% use CS alone, 12% epidural or spinal AS alone, 4% OA alone, and 28% combination. For template interstitial BT (n = 25), 44% use GA alone, 48% epidural alone or in combination with other AS, and 8% CS alone. Twenty-two percent of respondents provide AG or AS during applicator placement only, whereas 32% provide it during placement, planning, treatment, and removal. The most common reasons for not using CS or GA were the lack of AS resources and clinician preference. Seventy-three percent reported the belief that patients suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after BT. However, 68% reported not using techniques to alleviate BT-related emotional distress. Conclusions: Many U.S. brachytherapists report using GA, CS, or epidural AS; however, 10% are using only OA, and 22% offer AG/AS only during applicator placement. Furthermore, a majority of respondents believe post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms can occur after BT, but few offer any intervention. AS resources and clinician preferences should be targeted for the expansion of higher-quality care. © 2024 Elsevier Inc. |
