Prospective study of patient, nursing, and oncology provider perspectives on telemedicine visits for renal cell carcinoma clinical trials Journal Article


Authors: Doshi, S. D.; Knezevic, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Fischer, P.; Goodman, R.; Gornell, S.; Patel, S.; Puzio, C.; Ritea, A.; Lee, C. H.; Evans, L.; Voss, M. H.; Motzer, R. J.; Kotecha, R. R.
Article Title: Prospective study of patient, nursing, and oncology provider perspectives on telemedicine visits for renal cell carcinoma clinical trials
Abstract: Purpose: Clinical trials enable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients to receive promising investigational agents, yet access may be limited. Telemedicine (TM) is an increasingly utilized platform that can expand access, but perspectives on its use in clinical trial care are unknown. Patients and Methods: A prospective study was conducted between Jan 2023 – Oct 2023 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. RCC patients enrolled on therapeutic clinical trials who had prior TM visits were eligible. Surveys in English were distributed to patients, treating clinical trial nurses (CTNs), and oncology providers engaged in clinical trials. Results: 39 patients, 7 CTNs, and 15 oncology providers were included in our analysis. Regarding clinical trial care, 26 patients (67%) preferred in-person, 4 (11%) preferred TM, and 9 (22%) had no preference. However, 25 patients (64%) reported TM provided an equal quality of care, and 38 (97%) reported a positive or neutral experience. Conversely, 7 CTNs (100%) and 11 providers (73%) preferred in-person care while 4 (27%) indicated no preference. Most, including 6 CTNs (86%) and 13 providers (87%), reported that TM quality of care was inferior. However, most, including 7 CTNs (100%) and 14 providers (93%), reported a positive experience with TM. Conclusions: In this study, one third of RCC participants preferred TM or had no preference, and a majority felt TM delivered equal quality of care. Providers, however, preferred in-person visits and reported inferior quality of care with TM. These findings warrant further evaluation of safety and feasibility to optimize TM integration for clinical trial care delivery. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; aged; systemic therapy; cancer adjuvant therapy; cancer patient; antineoplastic agent; prospective study; cohort analysis; renal cell carcinoma; health care quality; cancer center; physician attitude; patient attitude; nurse attitude; clinical trials; patient preference; clinical trial (topic); rcc; telemedicine; nurse; oncologist; virtual; human; male; female; article; scheduled visit
Journal Title: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Volume: 23
Issue: 1
ISSN: 1558-7673
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2025-02-01
Start Page: 102268
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102268
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 39616970
PMCID: PMC11757079
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Corresponding authors is MSK author: Ritesh R. Kotecha -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Motzer
    1246 Motzer
  2. Martin Henner Voss
    290 Voss
  3. Suzanne S Gornell
    10 Gornell
  4. Alisa Trout
    14 Trout
  5. Patricia Marie Russ Fischer
    21 Fischer
  6. Sweta N Patel
    1 Patel
  7. Chung-Han   Lee
    157 Lee
  8. Andrea Knezevic
    107 Knezevic
  9. Ritesh Rajesh Kotecha
    94 Kotecha
  10. Lauren Anne Evans
    4 Evans
  11. Sahil Deepak Doshi
    19 Doshi
  12. Cindy Puzio
    1 Puzio