Predictors of response to CDK4/6i retrial after prior CDK4/6i failure in ER+ metastatic breast cancer Journal Article


Authors: Mai, N.; dos Anjos, C. H.; Razavi, P.; Safonov, A.; Patil, S.; Chen, Y.; Drago, J. Z.; Modi, S.; Bromberg, J. F.; Dang, C. T.; Liu, D.; Norton, L.; Robson, M.; Chandarlapaty, S.; Jhaveri, K.
Article Title: Predictors of response to CDK4/6i retrial after prior CDK4/6i failure in ER+ metastatic breast cancer
Abstract: After disease progression on endocrine therapy (ET) plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor, there is no standardized sequence for subsequent treatment lines for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). CDK4/6i retrial as a treatment strategy is commonplace in modern clinical practice; however, the available prospective data investigating this strategy have had inconclusive results. To frame this data in a real-world context, we performed a retrospective analysis assessing the efficacy of CDK4/6is in 195 patients who had previous exposure to CDK4/6i in a prior treatment line at our institution. Among patients who had stopped a CDK4/6i due to toxicity, CDK4/6i retrial either immediately after with a different CDK4/6i or in a further treatment line with the same initial CDK4/6i was both safe and effective, with a median time to treatment failure (TTF) of 10.1 months (95%CI, 4.8–16.9). For patients whose disease progressed on a prior CDK4/6i, we demonstrated comparable median TTFs for patients rechallenged with the same CDK4/6i (4.3 months, 95%CI 3.2–5.5) and with a different CDK4/6i (4.7 months, 95%CI 3.7–6.0) when compared to the recent PACE, PALMIRA, and MAINTAIN trials. Exploratory genomic analysis suggested that the presence of mutations known to confer CDK4/6i resistance, such as TP53 mutations, CDK4 amplifications, and RB1 or FAT1 loss of function mutations may be molecular biomarkers predictive of CDK4/6i retrial failure. © The Author(s) 2024.
Journal Title: npj Breast Cancer
Volume: 10
ISSN: 2374-4677
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group  
Date Published: 2024-10-18
Start Page: 92
Language: English
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00699-3
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11489574
PUBMED: 39424631
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Corresponding authors is MSK author: Komal Jhaveri -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Larry Norton
    758 Norton
  2. Jacqueline Bromberg
    141 Bromberg
  3. Mark E Robson
    676 Robson
  4. Chau Dang
    271 Dang
  5. Shanu Modi
    265 Modi
  6. Komal Lachhman Jhaveri
    201 Jhaveri
  7. Pedram Razavi
    172 Razavi
  8. Dazhi   Liu
    45 Liu
  9. Joshua Drago
    27 Drago
  10. Anton Safonov
    30 Safonov
  11. Yuan Chen
    38 Chen
  12. Nicholas Mai
    7 Mai