Recurrence of non–small cell lung cancer with visceral pleural invasion: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial Journal Article


Authors: Altorki, N.; Wang, X.; Damman, B.; Jones, D. R.; Wigle, D.; Port, J.; Conti, M.; Ashrafi, A. S.; Lieberman, M.; Landreneau, R.; Yasufuku, K.; Yang, S.; Mitchell, J. D.; Keenan, R.; Bauer, T.; Miller, D.; Kozono, D.; Mentlick, J.; Vokes, E.; Stinchcombe, T. E.
Article Title: Recurrence of non–small cell lung cancer with visceral pleural invasion: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial
Abstract: Key Points: Question: What are the oncologic outcomes following lobar or sublobar resection in patients with peripheral small (≤2 cm) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with visceral pleural invasion (VPI)? Findings: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of 697 patients with NSCLC, patients who had small (≤2cm) peripheral NSCLC with VPI (pT2) had unexpectedly higher recurrence rates and worse survival compared with patients with tumors without VPI, regardless of the extent of parenchymal resection. Meaning: The results of this study suggest that unexpectedly high recurrence rates, including distant recurrences, and worse survival of small peripheral NSCLCs with VPI are not mitigated by larger parenchymal resection. Importance: The randomized clinical trial Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 140503 showed that for patients with clinically staged T1N0 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ≤2 cm), sublobar resections were associated with similar oncological outcomes to those after lobar resection. The association of the extent of parenchymal resection with recurrence and survival in patients with tumors pathologically upstaged to T2 based on visceral pleural invasion (VPI) is controversial. Objective: To determine survival and recurrence rates in patients with small peripheral pT2 NSCLC (≤2 cm) that was treated by either lobar or sublobar resection in CALGB 140503. Design, Participants, and Setting: CALGB 140503, a randomized multicenter noninferiority trial, included 697 patients with small peripheral NSCLC that was clinically staged as T1N0. Enrollment was from June 2007 through March 2017 at 83 participating institutions, and after a median follow-up of 7 years, the primary outcome of disease-free survival after sublobar resection was noninferior to that after lobar resection. Intervention: Lobar or sublobar resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival end points were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Of 679 participants, 390 (57.4%) were female, and the median (range) age was 67.8 (37.8-89.7) years. Among 697 patients randomized, 566 (81.2%) had pT1 tumors (no VPI) and 113 (16.2%) had pT2 tumors (VPI). Five-year disease-free survival was 65.9% (95% CI, 61.9%-70.2%) in patients with pT1 compared with 53.3% (95% CI, 44.3%-64.1%) in patients with pT2 tumors (stratified log-rank: P =.02). Disease recurrence developed in 27.6% of patients with pT1 (locoregional only: 60 [10.8%]; distant only: 81 [14.6%]) and 41.6% of those with pT2 (locoregional only: 17 [15.0%]; distant only: 27 [23.9%]). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 73.1% (95% CI, 69.2%-77.1%) for pT1 tumors and 58.2% (95% CI, 49.2%-68.8%) for pT2 tumors (stratified log-rank: P =.01). There were no intergroup differences in disease-free or recurrence-free survival based on the extent of parenchymal resection. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this secondary analysis suggest that compared with patients with tumors without VPI, patients who had tumors with VPI had worse disease-free and recurrence-free survival and a higher rate of local and distant disease recurrence. These high rates of recurrence were independent of the extent of parenchymal resection, and these data support the inclusion of these patients in adjuvant therapy trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0049933 This secondary analysis of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 140503 randomized clinical trial examines survival and recurrence rates in patients with small peripheral pT2 non–small cell lung cancer that was treated by either lobar or sublobar resection.
Keywords: survival analysis; neoplasm recurrence, local; recurrence; questionnaires; confidence intervals; randomized controlled trials; neoplasm invasiveness; secondary analysis; descriptive statistics; funding source; post hoc analysis; treatment outcomes; kaplan-meier estimator; exploratory research; multicenter studies; cox proportional hazards model; random assignment; log-rank test; carcinoma, non-small-cell lung -- mortality; carcinoma, non-small-cell lung -- pathology; carcinoma, non-small-cell lung -- surgery; carcinoma, non-small-cell lung -- prognosis; human; male; female; adverse health care event; pleura -- pathology; pleural neoplasms -- therapy; pleura -- surgery
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
Volume: 10
Issue: 9
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2024-09-01
Start Page: 1179
End Page: 1186
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2491
PROVIDER: EBSCOhost
PROVIDER: cinahl plus with full text
PMCID: PMC11295064
PUBMED: 39088196
DOI/URL:
Notes: Source: CINAHL Plus with Full Text
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. David Randolph Jones
    417 Jones