Lobar or sublobar resection for peripheral stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer Journal Article


Authors: Altorki, N.; Wang, X.; Kozono, D.; Watt, C.; Landrenau, R.; Wigle, D.; Port, J.; Jones, D. R.; Conti, M.; Ashrafi, A. S.; Liberman, M.; Yasufuku, K.; Yang, S.; Mitchell, J. D.; Pass, H.; Keenan, R.; Bauer, T.; Miller, D.; Kohman, L. J.; Stinchcombe, T. E.; Vokes, E.
Article Title: Lobar or sublobar resection for peripheral stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The increased detection of small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has renewed interest in sublobar resection in lieu of lobectomy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, phase 3 trial in which patients with NSCLC clinically staged as T1aN0 (tumor size, ≤2 cm) were randomly assigned to undergo sublobar resection or lobar resection after intraoperative confirmation of node-negative disease. The primary end point was disease-free survival, defined as the time between randomization and disease recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary end points were overall survival, locoregional and systemic recurrence, and pulmonary functions. RESULTS: From June 2007 through March 2017, a total of 697 patients were assigned to undergo sublobar resection (340 patients) or lobar resection (357 patients). After a median follow-up of 7 years, sublobar resection was noninferior to lobar resection for disease-free survival (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 1.01; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.24). In addition, overall survival after sublobar resection was similar to that after lobar resection (hazard ratio for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.26). The 5-year disease-free survival was 63.6% (95% CI, 57.9 to 68.8) after sublobar resection and 64.1% (95% CI, 58.5 to 69.0) after lobar resection. The 5-year overall survival was 80.3% (95% CI, 75.5 to 84.3) after sublobar resection and 78.9% (95% CI, 74.1 to 82.9) after lobar resection. No substantial difference was seen between the two groups in the incidence of locoregional or distant recurrence. At 6 months postoperatively, a between-group difference of 2 percentage points was measured in the median percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, favoring the sublobar-resection group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with peripheral NSCLC with a tumor size of 2 cm or less and pathologically confirmed node-negative disease in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, sublobar resection was not inferior to lobectomy with respect to disease-free survival. Overall survival was similar with the two procedures. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; CALGB 140503 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00499330.). Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Keywords: controlled study; disease-free survival; retrospective studies; clinical trial; disease free survival; cancer staging; neoplasm staging; randomized controlled trial; carcinoma, non-small-cell lung; lung neoplasms; pneumonectomy; proportional hazards models; retrospective study; lung tumor; proportional hazards model; multicenter study; non small cell lung cancer; adverse event; procedures; humans; human
Journal Title: New England Journal of Medicine
Volume: 388
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0028-4793
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society  
Date Published: 2023-02-09
Start Page: 489
End Page: 498
Language: English
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212083
PUBMED: 36780674
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10036605
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 March 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. David Randolph Jones
    417 Jones