A novel frailty index can predict the short-term outcomes of esophagectomy in older patients with esophageal cancer Journal Article


Authors: Boerner, T.; Sewell, M.; Tin, A. L.; Vickers, A. J.; Harrington-Baksh, C.; Bains, M. S.; Bott, M. J.; Park, B. J.; Sihag, S.; Jones, D. R.; Downey, R. J.; Shahrokni, A.; Molena, D.
Article Title: A novel frailty index can predict the short-term outcomes of esophagectomy in older patients with esophageal cancer
Abstract: Background: Frailty, rather than age, is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. We sought to determine whether preoperative frailty as defined by a novel scoring system could predict the outcomes among older patients undergoing esophagectomy. Methods: We identified patients 65 years or older who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2021 at our institution. Frailty was assessed using the MSK-FI, which consists of 1 component related to functional status and 10 medical comorbidities. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to test for the associations between frailty and short-term outcomes, with continuous frailty score as the predictor and additionally adjusted for age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Results: In total, 447 patients were included in the analysis (median age of 71 years [interquartile range, 68–75]). Most of the patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment (81%), an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (86%), and minimally invasive surgery (55%). A total of 22 patients (4.9%) died within 90 days of surgery, 144 (32%) had a major complication, 81 (19%) were readmitted, and 31 (7.2%) were discharged to a facility. Of the patients who died within 90 days, 19 had a major complication, yielding a failure-to-rescue rate of 13%. The risk of 30-day major complications (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.09–1.41]; p = 0.001), readmissions (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.13–1.52]; p < 0.001), and discharge to a facility (OR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.49–2.37]; p < 0.001) increased with increasing frailty. Frailty and 90-day mortality were not associated. Conclusions: Frailty assessment during surgery decision-making can identify patients with a high risk of morbidity. © 2024 by the authors.
Keywords: adult; treatment outcome; aged; aged, 80 and over; major clinical study; mortality; neoadjuvant therapy; cancer staging; outcome assessment; prospective study; clinical assessment; morbidity; cohort analysis; postoperative complication; postoperative complications; comorbidity; surgery; gastrectomy; minimally invasive surgery; hospital readmission; epidemiology; esophagus cancer; forced expiratory volume; esophageal adenocarcinoma; decision making; esophagus tumor; esophageal neoplasms; esophagectomy; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; older patients; complication; ivor lewis esophagectomy; procedures; frailty; very elderly; humans; human; male; female; article; transhiatal esophagectomy; assessment of humans; ecog performance status; american society of anaesthesiologists score; memorial sloan kettering frailty index; novel scoring system; three hole esophagectomy
Journal Title: Current Oncology
Volume: 31
Issue: 8
ISSN: 1198-0052
Publisher: Multimed Inc  
Date Published: 2024-08-01
Start Page: 4685
End Page: 4694
Language: English
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31080349
PUBMED: 39195332
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11352928
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Daniela Molena -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrew J Vickers
    880 Vickers
  2. Bernard J Park
    263 Park
  3. Matthew Bott
    135 Bott
  4. Robert J Downey
    254 Downey
  5. Manjit S Bains
    338 Bains
  6. David Randolph Jones
    417 Jones
  7. Armin Shahrokni
    132 Shahrokni
  8. Daniela   Molena
    270 Molena
  9. Amy Lam Ling Tin
    114 Tin
  10. Smita Sihag
    96 Sihag
  11. Thomas Boerner
    70 Boerner
  12. Marisa Ann Sewell
    5 Sewell