A novel approach to quantify heterogeneity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: The hidden-genome classifier Journal Article


Authors: Song, Y.; Boerner, T.; Drill, E.; Shin, P.; Kumar, S.; Sigel, C.; Cercek, A.; Kemeny, N.; Abou-Alfa, G.; Iacobuzio-Donahue, C.; Cowzer, D.; Schultz, N.; Walch, H.; Balachandran, V.; Koerkamp, B. G.; Kingham, P.; Soares, K.; Wei, A.; D’Angelica, M.; Drebin, J.; Chandwani, R.; Harding, J. J.; Jarnagin, W.
Article Title: A novel approach to quantify heterogeneity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: The hidden-genome classifier
Abstract: Purpose: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) is a heterogeneous tumor. The hidden-genome classifier, a supervised machine learning–based algorithm, was used to quantify tumor heterogeneity and improve classification. Experimental Design: A retrospective review of 1,370 patients with IHC, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC), gallbladder cancer (GBC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or biphenotypic tumors was conducted. A hidden-genome model classified 527 IHC based on genetic similarity to EHC/GBC or HCC. Genetic, histologic, and clinical data were correlated. Results: In this study, 410 IHC (78%) had >50% genetic homology with EHC/GBC; 122 (23%) had >90% homology (“biliary class”), characterized by alterations of KRAS, SMAD4, and CDKN2A loss; 117 IHC (22%) had >50% genetic homology with HCC; and 30 (5.7%) had >90% homology (“HCC class”), characterized by TERT alterations. Patients with biliary- versus non-biliary-class IHC had median overall survival (OS) of 1 year (95% CI, 0.77, 1.5) versus 1.8 years (95% CI, 1.6, 2.0) for unresectable disease and 2.4 years (95% CI, 2.1, NR) versus 5.1 years (95% CI, 4.8, 6.9) for resectable disease. Large-duct IHC (n 1⁄4 28) was more common in the biliary class (n 1⁄4 27); the HCC class was composed mostly of small-duct IHC (64%, P 1⁄4 0.02). The hidden genomic classifier predicted OS independent of FGFR2 and IDH1 alterations. By contrast, the histology subtype did not predict OS. Conclusions: IHC genetics form a spectrum with worse OS for tumors genetically aligned with EHC/GBC. The classifier proved superior to histologic subtypes for predicting OS independent of FGFR2 and IDH1 alterations. These results may explain the differential treatment responses seen in IHC and may direct therapy by helping stratify patients in future clinical trials. ©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.
Keywords: adult; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; retrospective studies; gene mutation; major clinical study; overall survival; genetics; mutation; mortality; liver cell carcinoma; carcinoma, hepatocellular; liver neoplasms; tumor volume; cohort analysis; pathology; retrospective study; algorithms; protein p53; tumor marker; prediction; histology; algorithm; liver tumor; bile duct carcinoma; bile duct neoplasms; cholangiocarcinoma; cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2a; gallbladder neoplasms; tumor gene; gallbladder cancer; b raf kinase; fibroblast growth factor receptor 2; receptor, fibroblast growth factor, type 2; genetic heterogeneity; isocitrate dehydrogenase; bile duct tumor; isocitrate dehydrogenase 1; smad4 protein; gallbladder tumor; classifier; machine learning; high throughput sequencing; genetic similarity; idh1 protein, human; very elderly; humans; prognosis; human; male; female; article; fgfr2 protein, human; biomarkers, tumor
Journal Title: Clinical Cancer Research
Volume: 30
Issue: 16
ISSN: 1078-0432
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2024-08-15
Start Page: 3499
End Page: 3511
Language: English
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-24-0657
PUBMED: 38864854
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11326964
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Corresponding authors is MSK author: William Jarnagin -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. James Joseph Harding
    252 Harding
  2. Ghassan Abou-Alfa
    570 Abou-Alfa
  3. William R Jarnagin
    907 Jarnagin
  4. T Peter Kingham
    617 Kingham
  5. Nancy Kemeny
    544 Kemeny
  6. Carlie Selbo Sigel
    118 Sigel
  7. Nikolaus D Schultz
    491 Schultz
  8. Esther Naomi Drill
    96 Drill
  9. Jeffrey Adam Drebin
    167 Drebin
  10. Thomas Boerner
    72 Boerner
  11. Alice Chia-Chi Wei
    205 Wei
  12. Henry Stuart Walch
    100 Walch
  13. Kevin Cerqueira Soares
    138 Soares
  14. Paul J. Shin
    12 Shin
  15. Darren Cowzer
    30 Cowzer
  16. Yi Song
    10 Song
  17. Sandeep Kumar
    8 Kumar