Effect of cement volume on biomechanical response of a spine segment treated with a PEEK polymer implant: A finite element comparative study with vertebroplasty Journal Article


Authors: Vienney, C.; Hambli, R.; De Leacy, R.; Cornelis, F. H.
Article Title: Effect of cement volume on biomechanical response of a spine segment treated with a PEEK polymer implant: A finite element comparative study with vertebroplasty
Abstract: In the current study, a 3D finite element study was performed to investigate the biomechanical response of an osteoporotic spine segment treated with a novel transpedicular implant (V-STRUT©, Hyprevention, France) made of PEEK (polyetheretherketone) material combined with either injections of 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 cc of cement. The objective was to assess numerically the biomechanical performance of the implant in combination with different doses of the injected bone cement and to compare its performance with the gold standard vertebroplasty (VP) technique. A female (69 yo) was selected and a 3D finite element model of an osteoporotic spine segment was built based on a Computed Tomography (CT) scan performed from T12 to L2 with corresponding intervertebral discs and ligaments. A heterogeneous distribution of bone material properties was assigned to the bone using grey scale levels. Bilateral ellipsoid geometries of the inserted cement were retained for the V-STRUT and VP models based on experimental observation performed on different patients treated with the V-STRUT device. The current study demonstrated an optimal dose of 4 cc of bilaterally injected cement for the V-STRUT and VP techniques to restore the treated segment and confirmed that the V-STRUT device in combination with bone cement is superior to VP alone in establishing the normal stiffness and in reducing the applied stress to the immediately adjacent vertebral levels. Copyright © 2024 Vienney, Hambli, De Leacy and Cornelis.
Keywords: implant; patient monitoring; computerized tomography; bone; patient treatment; bone cement; dose; lumbar spine; vertebroplasty; finite element; compression fracture; biomechanics; finite element method; vertebral compression fractures; cement; vertebral compression fracture; vertebral compression; 'current; biomechanical response; lumbar spines
Journal Title: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Volume: 12
ISSN: 2296-4185
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.  
Date Published: 2024-06-11
Start Page: 1399851
Language: English
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1399851
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11196805
PUBMED: 38919381
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors