Finite element investigation of the influence of a new transpedicular vertebral implant positioning on biomechanical responses of the spine segment Journal Article


Authors: Hambli, R.; De Leacy, R.; Cornelis, F.; Vienney, C.
Article Title: Finite element investigation of the influence of a new transpedicular vertebral implant positioning on biomechanical responses of the spine segment
Abstract: The optimal positioning of an implant into a living organ such as femurs and vertebra is still an open problem. In particular, vertebral implant position has a significant impact on the results on spine behaviour after treatment in terms of stiffness, range of motion (ROM), wear, loosening and failure. In the current work, a 3D finite element analysis was conducted to investigate the positioning parameters of a novel transpedicular implant (V-STRUT©, Hyprevention, France) in terms of placement of the implant in the treated vertebra. The implant was designed in order to strength osteoporotic vertebral body and the related spine segment under compressive load. The effects of the axial and sagittal positions of the implant in the treated vertebra was investigated in terms of stress and stiffness variations. A 3D finite element model of an osteoporotic spine segment was built based on a Computed Tomography (CT) scan of an osteoporotic female (69 yo). The model is composed of T12, L1 and L2 vertebrae and corresponding intervertebral discs and ligaments. The bone tissue was modeled as a heterogeneous material with properties assigned based on the grey scale levels. The intervertebral discs were modeled using two regions describing the annulus and the nucleus and linear beam elements with specific stiffness each were used representing each ligament. The simulations indicated that the sagittal position (distance d) plays a role on the stress distribution. The closer the implant to the interior wall the lower the stress applied to the spine segment. Nevertheless, the axial plane position (distance h) have limited effects on the stress applied to the bone with a higher stress applied to the device (subjected to a higher bending load). These results can have direct clinical implications when dealing with the optimal placement of the implant. It is also possible to select a particular position in order to assign a given (target) stiffness for a patient. © 2024
Keywords: clinical article; aged; computer assisted tomography; simulation; computerized tomography; bone; osteoporosis; cervical spine; stiffness; compression fracture; biomechanics; implants (surgical); anthropometric parameters; finite element method; intervertebral disk; physiological stress; positioning; human; female; article; 3d finite element; spine segment; v-strut© device; struts; 3-d finite elements; biomechanical response; finite element investigation; implant positioning; osteoporotic; axial plane position; first lumbar vertebra; sagittal parameter; second lumbar vertebra; three dimensional finite element analysis
Journal Title: Medical Engineering and Physics
Volume: 124
ISSN: 1350-4533
Publisher: Ipem  
Date Published: 2024-01-31
Start Page: 104100
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104100
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11803580
PUBMED: 38418016
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors