Immune checkpoint inhibitors for POLE or POLD1 proofreading-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer Journal Article


Authors: Ambrosini, M.; Rousseau, B.; Manca, P.; Artz, O.; Marabelle, A.; André, T.; Maddalena, G.; Mazzoli, G.; Intini, R.; Cohen, R.; Cercek, A.; Segal, N. H.; Saltz, L.; Varghese, A. M.; Yaeger, R.; Nusrat, M.; Goldberg, Z.; Ku, G. Y.; El Dika, I.; Margalit, O.; Grinshpun, A.; Murtaza Kasi, P.; Schilsky, R.; Lutfi, A.; Shacham-Shmueli, E.; Khan Afghan, M.; Weiss, L.; Westphalen, C. B.; Conca, V.; Decker, B.; Randon, G.; Elez, E.; Fakih, M.; Schrock, A. B.; Cremolini, C.; Jayachandran, P.; Overman, M. J.; Lonardi, S.; Pietrantonio, F.
Article Title: Immune checkpoint inhibitors for POLE or POLD1 proofreading-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer
Abstract: Background: POLE and POLD1 proofreading deficiency (POLE/D1pd) define a rare subtype of ultramutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; over 100 mut/Mb). Disease-specific data about the activity and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in POLE/D1pd mCRC are lacking and it is unknown whether outcomes may be different from mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mCRCs treated with ICIs. Patients and methods: In this global study, we collected 27 patients with mCRC harboring POLE/D1 mutations leading to proofreading deficiency and treated with anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 alone +/− anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 agents. We collected clinicopathological and genomic characteristics, response, and survival outcomes after ICIs of POLE/D1pd mCRC and compared them with a cohort of 610 dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients treated with ICIs. Further genomic analyses were carried out in an independent cohort of 7241 CRCs to define POLE and POLD1pd molecular profiles and mutational signatures. Results: POLE/D1pd was associated with younger age, male sex, fewer RAS/BRAF driver mutations, and predominance of right-sided colon cancers. Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC (89% versus 54%; P = 0.01). After a median follow-up of 24.9 months (interquartile range: 11.3-43.0 months), patients with POLE/D1pd showed a significantly superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.74, P = 0.01] and superior overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.18, P = 0.09). In multivariable analyses including the type of DNA repair defect, POLE/D1pd was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.69, P = 0.013) and OS (HR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.98, P = 0.047). Molecular profiling showed that POLE/D1pd tumors have higher tumor mutational burden (TMB). Responses were observed in both subtypes and were associated with the intensity of POLE/D1pd signature. Conclusions: Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed more favorable outcomes compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC to treatment with ICIs in terms of tumor response and survival. © 2024 The Author(s)
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; clinical article; controlled study; treatment outcome; treatment response; aged; middle aged; gene mutation; overall survival; clinical feature; pathogenesis; comparative study; follow up; genetic analysis; dna repair; progression free survival; cohort analysis; genetic association; retrospective study; oncogene; ras protein; sex difference; age distribution; cytotoxic t lymphocyte antigen 4; b raf kinase; oncogene ras; sample size; braf gene; programmed death 1 ligand 1; metastatic colorectal cancer; overall response rate; immune checkpoint inhibitor; human; male; female; article; immune checkpoint inhibitors; pole gene; tumor mutational burden; molecular fingerprinting; pold1 gene; population structure; pold1 mutations; pole mutations; proofreading deficiency
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 35
Issue: 7
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2024-07-01
Start Page: 643
End Page: 655
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.03.009
PUBMED: 38777726
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Leonard B Saltz
    790 Saltz
  2. Neil Howard Segal
    209 Segal
  3. Anna Mary Varghese
    145 Varghese
  4. Geoffrey Yuyat Ku
    230 Ku
  5. Rona Denit Yaeger
    315 Yaeger
  6. Maliha Nusrat
    14 Nusrat
  7. Oliver Artz
    5 Artz