Pathological response in resectable non–small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis Journal Article


Authors: Waser, N. A.; Quintana, M.; Schweikert, B.; Chaft, J. E.; Berry, L.; Adam, A.; Vo, L.; Penrod, J. R.; Fiore, J.; Berry, D. A.; Goring, S.
Article Title: Pathological response in resectable non–small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Abstract: Background: Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy are needed to provide earlier treatment outcome indicators and accelerate drug approval. This study’s main objectives were to investigate the association among pathological complete response, major pathological response, event-free survival and overall survival and to determine whether treatment effects on pathological complete response and event-free survival correlate with treatment effects on overall survival. Methods: A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted to identify neoadjuvant studies in resectable non–small cell lung cancer. Analysis at the patient level using frequentist and Bayesian random effects (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival or event-free survival by pathological complete response or major pathological response status, yes vs no) and at the trial level using weighted least squares regressions (hazard ratio for overall survival or event-free survival vs pathological complete response, by treatment arm) were performed. Results: In both meta-analyses, pathological complete response yielded favorable overall survival compared with no pathological complete response (frequentist, 20 studies and 6530 patients: HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval = 0.42 to 0.57; Bayesian, 19 studies and 5988 patients: HR = 0.48, 95% probability interval = 0.43 to 0.55) and similarly for major pathological response (frequentist, 12 studies and 1193 patients: HR = 0.36, 95% confidence interval = 0.29 to 0.44; Bayesian, 11 studies and 1018 patients: HR = 0.33, 95% probability interval = 0.26 to 0.42). Across subgroups, estimates consistently showed better overall survival or event-free survival in pathological complete response or major pathological response compared with no pathological complete response or no major pathological response. Trial-level analyses showed a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival hazard ratios (R2 = 0.7159) but did not show a correlation between treatment effects on pathological complete response and overall survival or event-free survival. Conclusion: There was a strong and consistent association between pathological response and survival and a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer. © The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords: event free survival; treatment outcome; overall survival; cisplatin; fluorouracil; monotherapy; gemcitabine; paclitaxel; adjuvant therapy; neoadjuvant therapy; carboplatin; multiple cycle treatment; bayes theorem; etoposide; ifosfamide; vinblastine; docetaxel; correlation analysis; death; systematic review; vindesine; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; taxane derivative; mitomycin; pemetrexed; meta analysis; chemoradiotherapy; sample size; attributable risk; tegafur; non small cell lung cancer; pathological response; pathological complete response; publication bias; human; article; vinorelbine tartrate; major pathological response
Journal Title: JNCI Cancer Spectrum
Volume: 8
Issue: 3
ISSN: 2515-5091
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2024-06-01
Start Page: pkae021
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae021
PUBMED: 38521542
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11101053
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jamie Erin Chaft
    289 Chaft