Radiation dose-volume-response relationships for adverse events in childhood cancer survivors: Introduction to the scientific issues in PENTEC Review


Authors: Bentzen, S. M.; Vogelius, I. R.; Hodgson, D.; Howell, R.; Jackson, A.; Hua, C. H.; Olch, A. J.; Ronckers, C.; Kremer, L.; Milano, M.; Marks, L. B.; Constine, L. S.
Review Title: Radiation dose-volume-response relationships for adverse events in childhood cancer survivors: Introduction to the scientific issues in PENTEC
Abstract: At its very core, radiation oncology involves a trade-off between the benefits and risks of exposing tumors and normal tissue to relatively high doses of ionizing radiation. This trade-off is particularly critical in childhood cancer survivors (CCS), in whom both benefits and risks can be hugely consequential due to the long life expectancy if the primary cancer is controlled. Estimating the normal tissue–related risks of a specific radiation therapy plan in an individual patient relies on predictive mathematical modeling of empirical data on adverse events. The Pediatric Normal-Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) collaborative network was formed to summarize and, when possible, to synthesize dose-volume-response relationships for a range of adverse events incident in CCS based on the literature. Normal-tissue clinical radiation biology in children is particularly challenging for many reasons: (1) Childhood malignancies are relatively uncommon—constituting approximately 1% of new incident cancers in the United States—and biologically heterogeneous, leading to many small series in the literature and large variability within and between series. This creates challenges in synthesizing data across series. (2) CCS are at an elevated risk for a range of adverse health events that are not specific to radiation therapy. Thus, excess relative or absolute risk compared with a reference population becomes the appropriate metric. (3) Various study designs and quantities to express risk are found in the literature, and these are summarized. (4) Adverse effects in CCS often occur 30, 50, or more years after therapy. This limits the information content of series with even very extended follow-up, and lifetime risk estimates are typically extrapolations that become dependent on the mathematical model used. (5) The long latent period means that retrospective dosimetry is required, as individual computed tomography–based radiation therapy plans gradually became available after 1980. (6) Many individual patient-level factors affect outcomes, including age at exposure, attained age, lifestyle exposures, health behaviors, other treatment modalities, dose, fractionation, and dose distribution. (7) Prospective databases with individual patient-level data and radiation dosimetry are being built and will facilitate advances in dose-volume-response modeling. We discuss these challenges and attempts to overcome them in the setting of PENTEC. © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: child; treatment outcome; dose response; united states; cancer patient; cancer radiotherapy; follow up; neoplasm; neoplasms; radiotherapy dosage; radiotherapy; incidence; health behavior; radiation injury; oncology; risk factor; childhood cancer; radiation exposure; radiation response; cancer survivor; risk assessment; dose-response relationship, radiation; computerized tomography; radiation oncology; dosimetry; radiation dose fractionation; neoplasms, radiation-induced; heart infarction; irradiation; survivorship; radiation injuries; ionizing radiation; second cancer; radiation dose distribution; normal tissue; diseases; tissue; lifestyle; radiobiology; cancer survivors; radiation induced neoplasm; adverse event; scientific issues; high dose; dose-volume; adverse events; proton therapy; health risks; childhood cancer survivor; organs at risk; data synthesis; lifetime risk; humans; human; article; patient risk; x-ray computed tomography; mortality risk; all cause mortality; childhood cancers; radiation dose response; economic and social effects; long life; trade off; tumour tissue
Journal Title: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Volume: 119
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0360-3016
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-06-01
Start Page: 338
End Page: 353
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.028
PUBMED: 38760115
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrew Jackson
    253 Jackson