Textured versus smooth tissue expanders: A comparison of complications in 3526 breast reconstructions Journal Article


Authors: Nelson, J. A.; Rubenstein, R. N.; Vorstenbosch, J.; Haglich, K.; Poulton, R. T.; McGriff, D.; Stern, C. S.; Coriddi, M.; Cordeiro, P. G.; McCarthy, C. M.; Disa, J. J.; Mehrara, B. J.; Matros, E.
Article Title: Textured versus smooth tissue expanders: A comparison of complications in 3526 breast reconstructions
Abstract: Background: Increased understanding of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma has led to a shift away from textured breast devices. A few small studies have compared the complication rates of textured and smooth tissue expanders (TEs). The aim of this study was to compare complication profiles in patients undergoing two-stage postmastectomy breast reconstruction with either textured or smooth TEs.Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of female patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with textured or smooth TEs from 2018 to 2020 at their institution. Rates of seroma, infection/cellulitis, malposition/rotation, exposure, and TE loss were analyzed in the overall cohort and subgroups undergoing prepectoral and subpectoral TE placement. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to decrease the effects of confounders comparing textured and smooth TEs.Results: The authors analyzed 3526 TEs (1456 textured and 2070 smooth). More frequent use of acellular dermal matrix, SPY angiography, and pre pectoral TE placement was noted in the smooth TE cohort (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis suggested higher rates of infection/cellulitis, malposition/rotation, and exposure in smooth TEs (all P < 0.01). Rates of TE loss did not differ. After propensity matching, no differences were noted in infection or TE loss. Prepectoral smooth expanders had increased rates of malposition/rotation. Conclusions: TE surface type did not affect rates of TE loss, although increased rates of expander malposition were noted in the smooth prepectoral cohort. Further research is needed to examine breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma risk with temporary textured TE exposure to improve decision-making. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 153: 262e, 2024.)CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCW: Therapeutic, III.
Keywords: experience; implants; surface
Journal Title: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume: 153
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0032-1052
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2024-02-01
Start Page: 262e
End Page: 272e
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:001150115100038
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010600
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 37104467
PMCID: PMC11275556
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PubMed record and PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Jonas A. Nelson -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Joseph Disa
    262 Disa
  2. Carrie Stern
    39 Stern
  3. Babak Mehrara
    448 Mehrara
  4. Peter G Cordeiro
    282 Cordeiro
  5. Evan Matros
    202 Matros
  6. Colleen Marie McCarthy
    143 McCarthy
  7. Jonas Allan Nelson
    209 Nelson
  8. Michelle Renee Coriddi
    59 Coriddi
  9. Kathryn Ann Haglich
    27 Haglich