Cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with early-stage breast cancer and radiation therapy-related fatigue: A prospective pilot study Journal Article


Authors: Leeman, J. E.; Lapen, K.; Fuchs, H. E.; Goner, M.; Michalski, M.; Gillespie, E. F.; Jones, L. W.; McCormick, B.
Article Title: Cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with early-stage breast cancer and radiation therapy-related fatigue: A prospective pilot study
Abstract: Purpose: Fatigue is among the most common but most poorly understood radiation therapy–associated toxicities. This prospective study sought to investigate whether cardiorespiratory fitness, an integrative measure of whole-body cardiopulmonary function, is associated with patient-reported fatigue in women with early-stage breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: Patients with stage Tis-T2N0M0 breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 undergoing breast radiation therapy performed a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on a motorized treadmill to assess cardiorespiratory fitness as measured by peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak). Fatigue was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale. Both assessments were performed during or immediately after radiation therapy completion. All patients were treated with an opposed tangent technique to a dose of 4240 cGy in 16 fractions with or without a lumpectomy bed boost. Patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy were excluded. Pearson correlation coefficients and univariate linear regression were used to assess associations amongVO2peak, fatigue, and patient characteristics. Results: Twenty-eight patients (median age, 52 years; range, 31-71) completed a CPET and FACIT-Fatigue assessment. Median VO2peak was 25.1 mL O2.kg–1.min–1 (range, 16.7-41.7). The majority of patients (78.6%) displayed a VO2peak lower than their age-predicted VO2peak. Both age and body mass index were significantly associated with VO2peak levels. The median FACIT-Fatigue score was 41.5 (range, 10-52), with lower values indicating more fatigue. VO2peak was not significantly associated with FACIT-Fatigue score (P = .20). Conclusions: VO2peak was not a significant predictor of radiation therapy–related fatigue. Most patients with breast cancer had marked impairments in cardiorespiratory fitness as determined by VO2peak. Larger prospective studies are needed to further investigate this novel finding and evaluate the effects of interventions aimed at improving cardiorespiratory fitness and their ability to potentially prevent fatigue. © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; aged; fatigue; cancer patient; cancer radiotherapy; chemotherapy; cancer staging; prospective study; breast cancer; radiotherapy dosage; radiotherapy; estrogen; estrogen therapy; age; cancer hormone therapy; body mass; correlation coefficient; pilot study; radiation dose fractionation; early cancer; exercise test; cardiopulmonary exercise test; diseases; lumpectomy; pilot studies; whole-body; early-stage breast cancer; correlation methods; chronic illness; cardiopulmonary function; cardiorespiratory fitness; human; female; article; functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue scale; ecog performance status; breast radiotherapy; prospectives; peak oxygen uptake; cancer and radiation therapies; fatigue scores; treadmill test
Journal Title: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Volume: 118
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0360-3016
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-03-15
Start Page: 1060
End Page: 1065
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.040
PUBMED: 37914143
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11390011
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Beryl McCormick -- Mithat Gonen's last name is misspelled in the publication -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mithat Gonen
    1030 Gonen
  2. Beryl McCormick
    372 McCormick
  3. Lee Winston Jones
    177 Jones
  4. Erin Faye Gillespie
    149 Gillespie
  5. Kaitlyn Ann Lapen
    39 Lapen
  6. Hannah Fuchs
    7 Fuchs