Post-surgical ctDNA-based molecular residual disease detection in patients with stage I uterine malignancies Journal Article


Authors: Recio, F.; Scalise, C. B.; Loar, P.; Lumish, M.; Berman, T.; Peddada, A.; Kalashnikova, E.; Rivero-Hinojosa, S.; Beisch, T.; Nicosia, B.; Farmer, T.; Dutta, P.; Malhotra, M.; ElNaggar, A. C.; Liu, M. C.; Vaccarello, L.; Holloway, R. W.
Article Title: Post-surgical ctDNA-based molecular residual disease detection in patients with stage I uterine malignancies
Abstract: Introduction: Among uterine malignancies, endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common cancer of the female reproductive tract. Traditionally, risk stratification in EC is determined by standard clinicopathological risk factors. Although circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a prognostic biomarker in various malignancies, its clinical validity in EC remains to be established. Methods: In this analysis of real-world data, 267 plasma samples from 101 patients with stage I EC were analyzed using a tumor-informed ctDNA assay (SignateraTM bespoke mPCR-NGS). Patients were followed post-surgically and monitored with ctDNA testing for a median of 6.8 months (range: 0.37–19.1). Results: Patients who tested ctDNA-positive at both their first time point and longitudinally experienced inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 6.2; p = 0.0006 and HR = 15.5; p < 0.0001, respectively), and showed a recurrence rate of 58% and 52%, vs. 6% and 0%, respectively for the ctDNA-negative patients. Most ctDNA-positive patients had high-risk histologies or sarcoma, versus low-risk and high-intermediate risk (H-IR) EC. Furthermore, patients with high-risk histologies who were ctDNA-positive showed shorter RFS compared to those who tested negative (HR = 9.5; p = 0.007), and those who tested positive in the low/H-IR cohort (HR = 0.25; p = 0.04). Post-surgically, detectable ctDNA was highly prognostic of clinical outcome and remained the only significant risk factor for recurrence when adjusted for clinicopathological risk factors, such as histologic risk group, mismatch repair (MMR), and p53 status. Conclusion: Incorporating ctDNA monitoring along with traditional known risk factors may aid in identifying patients with stage I EC who are at highest risk of recurrence, and possibly aid in treatment stratification. © 2023 The Authors
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; controlled study; treatment outcome; aged; cancer surgery; major clinical study; histopathology; cancer patient; cancer staging; recurrence risk; follow up; endometrial cancer; cohort analysis; retrospective study; protein p53; high risk patient; sarcoma; minimal residual disease; mismatch repair; genomics; high risk population; uterus cancer; longitudinal study; recurrence free survival; intermediate risk patient; molecular diagnosis; clinical outcome; risk groups; tumor biomarkers; low risk patient; cancer prognosis; human; female; article; chloroplast dna; circulating tumor dna/ctdna
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 182
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-03-01
Start Page: 63
End Page: 69
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.12.025
PUBMED: 38262240
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Melissa Amy Lumish
    39 Lumish