Incident fractures of the distal radius: Dual-energy CT-derived metrics for opportunistic risk stratification Journal Article


Authors: Gruenewald, L. D.; Booz, C.; Gotta, J.; Reschke, P.; Martin, S. S.; Mahmoudi, S.; Bernatz, S.; Eichler, K.; D'Angelo, T.; Chernyak, V.; Sommer, C. M.; Vogl, T. J.; Koch, V.
Article Title: Incident fractures of the distal radius: Dual-energy CT-derived metrics for opportunistic risk stratification
Abstract: Background: Dual-energy CT (DECT)-derived bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal radius and other CT-derived metrics related to bone health have been suggested for opportunistic osteoporosis screening and risk evaluation for sustaining distal radius fractures (DRFs). Methods: The distal radius of patients who underwent DECT between 01/2016 and 08/2021 was retrospectively analyzed. Cortical Hounsfield Unit (HU), trabecular HU, cortical thickness, and DECT-based BMD were acquired from a non-fractured, metaphyseal area in all examinations. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the area under the curve (AUC) values for predicting DRFs based on DECT-derived BMD, HU values, and cortical thickness. Logistic regression models were then employed to assess the associations of these parameters with the occurrence of DRFs. Results: In this study, 263 patients (median age: 52 years; interquartile range: 36–64; 132 women; 192 fractures) were included. ROC curve analysis revealed a higher area under the curve (AUC) value for DECT-derived BMD compared to cortical HU, trabecular HU, and cortical thickness (0.91 vs. 0.61, 0.64, and 0.69, respectively; p <.001). Logistic regression models confirmed the association between lower DECT-derived BMD and the occurrence of DRFs (Odds Ratio, 0.83; p <.001); however, no influence was observed for cortical HU, trabecular HU, or cortical thickness. Conclusions: DECT can be used to assess the BMD of the distal radius without dedicated equipment such as calibration phantoms to increase the detection rates of osteoporosis and stratify the individual risk to sustain DRFs. In contrast, assessing HU-based values and cortical thickness does not provide clinical benefit. © 2023 The Author(s)
Keywords: adult; controlled study; middle aged; major clinical study; area under the curve; patient selection; reproducibility; retrospective study; prediction; risk factor; bone density; population research; osteoporosis; image reconstruction; computed tomography; bone disease; receiver operating characteristic; metaphysis; metabolic; musculoskeletal system parameters; osteoporotic fractures; human; male; female; article; dual energy computed tomography; cortical hounsfield unit; cortical thickness (bone); distal radius fracture; trabecular hounsfield unit
Journal Title: European Journal of Radiology
Volume: 171
ISSN: 0720-048X
Publisher: Elsevier B.V  
Date Published: 2024-02-01
Start Page: 111283
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111283
PUBMED: 38183896
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors