The World Health Organization classification of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology stratifies risk of malignancy and outcome for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas Journal Article


Authors: Lui, S. K.; Hargett, I.; Pharaa, Z.; Aviles, M.; Botelho, S.; Feliciano, D. L.; Kim, V.; Sigel, K.; Armstrong, M.; Wilson, C. E.; Shah, P.; Soares, K.; Sigel, C.
Article Title: The World Health Organization classification of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology stratifies risk of malignancy and outcome for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas
Abstract: Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently published a classification for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology with differences compared to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) classification. Methods: Retrospective data were collected from pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations from 2014 to 2017 at a pancreatic cancer center. Absolute risk of malignancy (AROM), relative risk (to benign), performance characteristics, and overall survival were calculated for the entire cohort with comparison of cysts and solid lesions. Results: In total, 2562 cases were included: 16% cyst (n = 411) and 84% solid (n = 2151). The histologic confirmation rate was 43% (n = 1101) and the median follow-up (for benign) was 56 months. For WHO I–VII, overall AROM (%) was 23, 22, 62, 13, 65, 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 13, 38, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 29, 70, 15, 100, 99, and 100. For PSC I–VI, overall AROM (%) was 23, 29, 64, 0 (IVa), 60 (IVb), 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 0, 21, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 35, 73, 0, 92, 99, and 100. The difference in relative risk for a cyst (vs. solid) overall was 0.38 for WHO and 0.26 for PSC. WHO and PSC categories showed stratification for the probability of overall survival. Conclusions: Cystic versus solid lesion type can dramatically affect AROM, particularly for nondiagnostic (I), benign (II), atypical (III), and WHO V categories. WHO IV conveys a similarly low AROM for cystic and solid types. Both classifications stratify the probability of overall survival, including the newly introduced categories WHO IV and WHO V. © 2023 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: controlled study; human tissue; retrospective studies; major clinical study; overall survival; cancer risk; patient selection; pancreas cancer; pancreatic neoplasms; follow up; sensitivity and specificity; pancreas; cytology; cohort analysis; pathology; retrospective study; information processing; risk factor; histology; risk assessment; probability; pancreas tumor; world health organization; cancer classification; biliary tract cancer; cytopathology; predictive value; cyst; cysts; diagnostic test accuracy study; risk of malignancy; pancreaticobiliary; endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy; endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration; humans; human; male; female; article; endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (eus-fna)
Journal Title: Cancer Cytopathology
Volume: 131
Issue: 12
ISSN: 1934-662X
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons  
Date Published: 2023-12-01
Start Page: 762
End Page: 771
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22754
PUBMED: 37602886
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11321709
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PubMed record and PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Carlie Sigel -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Carlie Selbo Sigel
    115 Sigel
  2. Pari Mayank Shah
    47 Shah
  3. Kevin Cerqueira Soares
    136 Soares
  4. Veronica Joohyun Kim
    7 Kim
  5. Shu Kwun Lui
    2 Lui
  6. Mariela Aviles
    2 Aviles
  7. Zaynab Pharaa
    2 Pharaa
  8. Christina E. Wilson
    4 Wilson