Prevalence, trends, and characteristics of trials investigating local therapy in contemporary phase 3 clinical cancer research Journal Article


Authors: Sherry, A. D.; Corrigan, K. L.; Kouzy, R.; Jaoude, J. A.; Yang, Y.; Patel, R. R.; Totten, D. J.; Newman, N. B.; Das, P.; Taniguchi, C.; Minsky, B.; Snyder, R. A.; Fuller, C. D.; Ludmir, E.
Article Title: Prevalence, trends, and characteristics of trials investigating local therapy in contemporary phase 3 clinical cancer research
Abstract: Background: Although most patients with cancer are treated with local therapy (LT), the proportion of late-phase clinical trials investigating local therapeutic interventions is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion, characteristics, and trends of phase 3 cancer clinical trials assessing the therapeutic value of LT over time. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of interventional randomized controlled trials in oncology published from 2002 through 2020 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Trends and characteristics of LT trials were compared to all other trials. Results: Of 1877 trials screened, 794 trials enrolling 584,347 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 27 trials (3%) included a primary randomization assessing LT compared with 767 trials (97%) investigating systemic therapy or supportive care. Annual increase in the number of LT trials (slope [m] = 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.39; p <.001) was outpaced by the increase of trials testing systemic therapy or supportive care (m = 7.57; 95% CI, 6.03–9.11; p <.001). LT trials were more often sponsored by cooperative groups (22 of 27 [81%] vs. 211 of 767 [28%]; p <.001) and less often sponsored by industry (5 of 27 [19%] vs. 609 of 767 [79%]; p <.001). LT trials were more likely to use overall survival as primary end point compared to other trials (13 of 27 [48%] vs. 199 of 767 [26%]; p =.01). Conclusions: In contemporary late-phase oncology research, LT trials are increasingly under-represented, under-funded, and evaluate more challenging end points compared to other modalities. These findings strongly argue for greater resource allocation and funding mechanisms for LT clinical trials. Plain language summary: Most people who have cancer receive treatments directed at the site of their cancer, such as surgery or radiation. We do not know, however, how many trials test surgery or radiation compared to drug treatments (that go all over the body). We reviewed trials testing the most researched strategies (phase 3) completed between 2002 and 2020. Only 27 trials tested local treatments like surgery or radiation compared to 767 trials testing other treatments. Our study has important implications for funding research and understanding cancer research priorities. © 2023 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: controlled study; major clinical study; overall survival; systemic therapy; cancer patient; palliative care; randomized controlled trial; palliative therapy; prevalence; oncology; cancer research; patient care; radiation oncology; medical oncology; cross-sectional study; phase 3 clinical trial; trend study; surgical oncology; trial design; human; article; phase 3 clinical trials
Journal Title: Cancer
Volume: 129
Issue: 21
ISSN: 0008-543X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2023-11-01
Start Page: 3430
End Page: 3438
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34929
PUBMED: 37382235
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11349322
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Roshal Patel
    12 Patel