The preferred design of the profunda artery perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction: Transverse or diagonal? Journal Article
| Authors: | Cohen, Z.; Azoury, S. C.; Nelson, J. A.; Haglich, K.; Dayan, J. H.; Matros, E.; Allen, R. J. Jr |
| Article Title: | The preferred design of the profunda artery perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction: Transverse or diagonal? |
| Abstract: | Background: Since its introduction for autologous breast reconstruction in 2010, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has emerged as a preferred choice when an abdominal flap is suboptimal. The traditional transverse design (tPAP) was popularized, given the inconspicuous donor scar. A diagonal design (dPAP) has since evolved to address some of the shortcomings of the tPAP. The authors aimed to compare outcomes of tPAP/dPAP flaps harvested for breast reconstruction by a single surgeon. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted from 2017 to 2022 of patients undergoing tPAP versus dPAP-based breast reconstruction by a single surgeon at a tertiary cancer center. Patient variables and operative variables were assessed. Need for additional symmetrizing breast procedures were compared. Complications and BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed. Results: Thirty-nine flaps were used to reconstruct 35 breasts in 24 patients. Average follow-up for the group was 1.8 years. The groups were similar with respect to demographics. The majority of dPAP flaps had two perforators, whereas most tPAP flaps had one perforator. The dPAP flaps had greater average weights, width, and overall surface area. There were no cases of partial/total flap loss. Complications and PROM results were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: The dPAP design allows for a larger skin paddle and greater tissue harvest and capture of cutaneous perforators, without increasing the risk of complications or compromising satisfaction. It should be considered as a viable option in patients unable to undergo abdominal-based reconstruction. Additional patients and multi-institutional efforts are necessary to better compare advantages of either design. © 2023 Authors. All rights reserved. |
| Journal Title: | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open |
| Volume: | 11 |
| Issue: | 8 |
| ISSN: | 2169-7574 |
| Publisher: | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
| Date Published: | 2023-08-01 |
| Start Page: | e5188 |
| Language: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1097/gox.0000000000005188 |
| PROVIDER: | scopus |
| PMCID: | PMC10445787 |
| PUBMED: | 37621915 |
| DOI/URL: | |
| Notes: | Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed (via Conflict of Interest statement) and PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Robert Allen Jr -- Source: Scopus |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
Related MSK Work