Perioperative versus total neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer Journal Article


Authors: Yang, J.; Greally, M.; Strong, V. E.; Coit, D. G.; Chou, J. F.; Capanu, M.; Maron, S. B.; Kelsen, D. P.; Ilson, D. H.; Janjigian, Y. Y.; Ku, G. Y.
Article Title: Perioperative versus total neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer
Abstract: Background: Perioperative chemotherapy is standard of care management for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC), but a substantial proportion of patients do not complete adjuvant therapy due to postoperative complications and prolonged recovery. Administration of all chemotherapy prior to surgery in the form of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) may optimize complete delivery of systemic therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of GC patients who had surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) from May 2014 to June 2020. Results: One hundred and forty-nine patients were identified; 121 patients received perioperative chemotherapy and 28 patients received TNT. TNT was chosen if patients had interim radiographic and/or clinical response to treatment. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two group except for chemotherapy regimen; more TNT patients received FLOT compared to the perioperative group (79% vs. 31%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who completed all planned cycles, but TNT patients received a higher proportion of cycles containing all chemotherapy drugs (93% vs. 74%, P<0.001). Twenty-nine patients (24%) in the perioperative group did not receive intended adjuvant therapy. There was no significant difference in hospital length of stay or surgical morbidity. The overall distribution of pathologic stage was similar between the two groups. Fourteen percent of TNT patients and 5.8% of perioperative patients achieved a pathologic complete response (P=0.6). There was no significant difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) between the TNT and perioperative groups [24-month OS rate 77% vs. 85%, HR 1.69 (95% CI: 0.80–3.56)]. Conclusions: Our study was limited by a small TNT sample size and biases inherent to a retrospective analysis. TNT appears to be feasible in a select population, without any increase in surgical morbidity. © Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; controlled study; treatment response; cancer surgery; unclassified drug; major clinical study; overall survival; cancer recurrence; cancer adjuvant therapy; cancer patient; morbidity; retrospective study; length of stay; adjuvant chemotherapy; remission; stomach cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; perioperative chemotherapy; sample size; gastric cancer; recurrence free survival; human; male; female; article; total neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Journal Title: Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Volume: 14
Issue: 3
ISSN: 2078-6891
Publisher: Pioneer Bioscience Publishing Company  
Date Published: 2023-06-30
Start Page: 1193
End Page: 1203
Language: English
DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-4
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10331735
PUBMED: 37435205
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK corresponding author is Jessica Yang -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Joanne Fu-Lou Chou
    331 Chou
  2. Geoffrey Yuyat Ku
    230 Ku
  3. Marinela Capanu
    385 Capanu
  4. Yelena Yuriy Janjigian
    394 Janjigian
  5. Vivian Strong
    264 Strong
  6. Daniel Coit
    542 Coit
  7. David H Ilson
    433 Ilson
  8. David P Kelsen
    537 Kelsen
  9. Steven Maron
    102 Maron
  10. Jessica Yang
    10 Yang