Multicenter phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Coleman, J. A.; Yip, W.; Wong, N. C.; Sjoberg, D. D.; Bochner, B. H.; Dalbagni, G.; Donat, S. M.; Herr, H. W.; Cha, E. K.; Donahue, T. F.; Pietzak, E. J.; Hakimi, A. A.; Kim, K.; Al-Ahmadie, H. A.; Vargas, H. A.; Alvim, R. G.; Ghafoor, S.; Benfante, N. E.; Meraney, A. M.; Shichman, S. J.; Kamradt, J. M.; Nair, S. G.; Baccala, A. A. Jr; Palyca, P.; Lash, B. W.; Rizvi, M. A.; Swanson, S. K.; Muina, A. F.; Apolo, A. B.; Iyer, G.; Rosenberg, J. E.; Teo, M. Y.; Bajorin, D. F.
Article Title: Multicenter phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Abstract: PURPOSENeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has proven survival benefits for patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, yet its role for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains undefined. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial of NAC with gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin (GC) for patients with high-risk UTUC before extirpative surgery to evaluate response, survival, and tolerability.METHODSEligible patients with defined criteria for high-risk localized UTUC received four cycles of split-dose GC before surgical resection and lymph node dissection. The primary study end point was rate of pathologic response (defined as < ypT2N0). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability.RESULTSAmong 57 patients evaluated, 36 (63%) demonstrated pathologic response (95% CI, 49 to 76). A complete pathologic response (ypT0N0) was noted in 11 patients (19%). Fifty-one patients (89%) tolerated at least three complete cycles of split-dose GC, 27 patients (47%) tolerated four complete cycles, and all patients proceeded to surgery. With a median follow up of 3.1 years, 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 89% (95% CI, 81 to 98) and 72% (95% CI, 59 to 87), while 2- and 5-year OS rates were 93% (95% CI, 86 to 100) and 79% (95% CI, 67 to 94), respectively. Pathologic complete and partial responses were associated with improved PFS and OS compared with nonresponders (≥ ypT2N any; 2-year PFS 100% and 95% v 76%, P <.001; 2-year OS 100% and 100% v 80%, P <.001).CONCLUSIONNAC with split-dose GC for high-risk UTUC is a well-tolerated, effective therapy demonstrating evidence of pathologic response that is associated with favorable survival outcomes. Given that these survival outcomes are superior to historical series, these data support the use of NAC as a standard of care for high-risk UTUC, and split-dose GC is a viable option for NAC. © American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: clinical trial; cisplatin; gemcitabine; neoadjuvant therapy; phase 2 clinical trial; bladder tumor; urinary bladder neoplasms; multicenter study; carcinoma, transitional cell; transitional cell carcinoma; humans; human
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 41
Issue: 8
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2023-03-10
Start Page: 1618
End Page: 1625
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00763
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10043554
PUBMED: 36603175
DOI/URL:
Notes: MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Jonathan Coleman -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jonathan Coleman
    343 Coleman
  2. Dean Bajorin
    658 Bajorin
  3. Guido Dalbagni
    325 Dalbagni
  4. Sherri M Donat
    174 Donat
  5. Gopakumar Vasudeva Iyer
    344 Iyer
  6. Daniel D. Sjoberg
    234 Sjoberg
  7. Bernard Bochner
    468 Bochner
  8. Harry W Herr
    594 Herr
  9. Jonathan Eric Rosenberg
    511 Rosenberg
  10. Abraham Ari Hakimi
    324 Hakimi
  11. Timothy Francis Donahue
    72 Donahue
  12. Eugene K. Cha
    100 Cha
  13. Kwanghee   Kim
    43 Kim
  14. Min Yuen   Teo
    105 Teo
  15. Nicole E Benfante
    161 Benfante
  16. Eugene J Pietzak
    116 Pietzak
  17. Ricardo Goncalves Alvim
    25 Alvim
  18. Nathan Colin Wong
    25 Wong
  19. Soleen Ghafoor
    17 Ghafoor
  20. Wesley Yip
    12 Yip