Prospective clinical genomic profiling of Ewing sarcoma: ERF and FGFR1 mutations as recurrent secondary alterations of potential biologic and therapeutic relevance Journal Article


Authors: Ogura, K.; Elkrief, A.; Bowman, A. S.; Koche, R. P.; de Stanchina, E.; Benayed, R.; Mauguen, A.; Mattar, M. S.; Khodos, I.; Meyers, P. A.; Healey, J. H.; Tap, W. D.; Hameed, M.; Zehir, A.; Shukla, N.; Sawyers, C.; Bose, R.; Slotkin, E.; Ladanyi, M.
Article Title: Prospective clinical genomic profiling of Ewing sarcoma: ERF and FGFR1 mutations as recurrent secondary alterations of potential biologic and therapeutic relevance
Abstract: PURPOSE Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a primitive sarcoma defined by EWSR1-ETS fusions as the primary driver alteration. To better define the landscape of cooperating secondary genetic alterations in ES, we analyzed clinical genomic profiling data of 113 patients with ES, a cohort including more adult patients (> 18 years) and more patients with advanced stage at presentation than previous genomic cohorts. METHODS The data set consisted of patients with ES prospectively tested with the US Food and Drug Administration-cleared Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets large panel, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing assay. To assess the functional significance of ERF loss, we generated ES cell lines with increased expression of ERF and lines with knockdown of ERF. We assessed cell viability, clonogenic growth, and motility in these ES lines and performed transcriptomic and epigenetic analyses. Finally, we validated our findings in vivo using cell line xenografts. RESULTS Novel subsets were defined by recurrent secondary alterations in ERF, which encodes an ETS domain transcriptional repressor, in 7% of patients (five truncating mutations, one deep deletion, and two missense mutations) and in FGFR1 in another 2.7% (one amplification and two known activating mutations). ERF alterations were nonoverlapping with STAG2 alterations. In vitro, increased expression of ERF decreased tumor cell growth, colony formation, and motility in two ES cell lines, whereas ERF loss induced cellular proliferation and clonogenic growth. Transcriptomic analysis of cell lines with ERF loss revealed an increased expression of genes and pathways associated with aggressive tumor biology, and epigenetic, chromatin-based studies revealed that ERF competes with EWSR1-FLI1 at ETS-binding sites. CONCLUSION Our findings open avenues to new insights into ES pathobiology and to novel therapeutic approaches in a subset of patients with ES. (c) 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Keywords: gene; transcription factor; family; fusion; expression; translocation; generation; landscape; stag2
Journal Title: JCO Precision Oncology
Volume: 6
ISSN: 2473-4284
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2022-01-01
Start Page: e2200048
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000975488400040
DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00048
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC9384944
PUBMED: 35952322
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PubMed record and PDF. Corresponding author is MSK author Marc Ladanyi -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Charles L Sawyers
    226 Sawyers
  2. Meera Hameed
    284 Hameed
  3. Marc Ladanyi
    1332 Ladanyi
  4. Ahmet Zehir
    344 Zehir
  5. Paul Meyers
    311 Meyers
  6. John H Healey
    551 Healey
  7. Neerav Shukla
    160 Shukla
  8. William Douglas Tap
    376 Tap
  9. Emily Kanaya Slotkin
    65 Slotkin
  10. Richard Patrick Koche
    176 Koche
  11. Rym Benayed
    188 Benayed
  12. Inna   Khodos
    36 Khodos
  13. Audrey   Mauguen
    157 Mauguen
  14. Rohit   Bose
    6 Bose
  15. Marissa   Mattar
    57 Mattar
  16. Anita S Bowman
    44 Bowman
  17. Koichi Ogura
    15 Ogura
  18. Arielle Elkrief
    43 Elkrief