Clinical and genomic characterization of bladder carcinomas with glandular phenotype Journal Article


Authors: Almassi, N.; Whiting, K.; Toubaji, A.; Lenis, A. T.; Jordan, E. J.; Won, H.; Regazzi, A. M.; Chen, Y. B.; Gopalan, A.; Sirintrapun, S. J.; Fine, S. W.; Tickoo, S. K.; Ostrovnaya, I.; Pietzak, E. J.; Cha, E. K.; Goh, A. C.; Donahue, T. F.; Herr, H. W.; Donat, S. M.; Dalbagni, G.; Bochner, B. H.; Teo, M. Y.; Funt, S. A.; Rosenberg, J. E.; Reuter, V. E.; Bajorin, D. F.; Solit, D. B.; Al-Ahmadie, H.; Iyer, G.
Article Title: Clinical and genomic characterization of bladder carcinomas with glandular phenotype
Abstract: PURPOSE To compare oncologic outcomes and genomic alteration profiles in patients with bladder and urachal adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma (UC) with glandular differentiation, and UC, not otherwise specified (NOS) undergoing surgical resection, with emphasis on response to systemic therapy. METHODS We identified patients with bladder cancer with glandular variants who underwent surgical resection at Memorial Sloan Kettering from 1995 to 2018 (surgical cohort) and/or patients who had tumor sequencing using a targeted next-generation sequencing platform (genomics cohort). Pathologic complete and partial response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival were measured. Alteration frequencies between histologic subtypes were compared. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients with bladder adenocarcinoma, 46 with urachal adenocarcinoma, 84 with UC with glandular differentiation, and 1,049 with UC, NOS comprised the surgical cohort. Despite more advanced disease in patients with bladder and urachal adenocarcinoma, no significant differences in recurrence or cancer-specific survival by histology were observed after adjusting for stage. In patients with UC with glandular differentiation, NAC resulted in partial (<= pT1N0) and complete (pT0N0) responses in 28% and 17%, respectively. Bladder and urachal adenocarcinoma genomic profiles resembled colorectal adenocarcinoma with frequent TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA alterations while the genomic profile of UC with glandular differentiation more closely resembled UC, NOS. Limitations include retrospective nature of analysis and small numbers of nonurothelial histology specimens. CONCLUSION The genomic profile of bladder adenocarcinomas resembled colorectal adenocarcinomas, whereas UC with glandular differentiation more closely resembled UC, NOS. Differences in outcomes among patients with glandular bladder cancer variants undergoing surgical resection were largely driven by differences in stage. Cisplatin-based NAC demonstrated activity in UC with glandular differentiation, suggesting NAC should be considered for this histologic variant. (c) 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Keywords: radical cystectomy; urothelial carcinoma; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; management; outcomes; urachal carcinoma; cancer; promoter mutations
Journal Title: JCO Precision Oncology
Volume: 6
ISSN: 2473-4284
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2022-01-01
Start Page: e2100392
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000975488400005
DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00392
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC9249273
PUBMED: 35731998
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PubMed record and PDF. Corresponding author is MSK author Gopa Iyer-- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Dean Bajorin
    658 Bajorin
  2. Guido Dalbagni
    325 Dalbagni
  3. Sherri M Donat
    174 Donat
  4. David Solit
    779 Solit
  5. Satish K Tickoo
    483 Tickoo
  6. Anuradha Gopalan
    417 Gopalan
  7. Gopakumar Vasudeva Iyer
    344 Iyer
  8. Yingbei Chen
    398 Chen
  9. Bernard Bochner
    468 Bochner
  10. Samson W Fine
    462 Fine
  11. Victor Reuter
    1228 Reuter
  12. Harry W Herr
    594 Herr
  13. Ashley Regazzi
    89 Regazzi
  14. Jonathan Eric Rosenberg
    511 Rosenberg
  15. Timothy Francis Donahue
    72 Donahue
  16. Eugene K. Cha
    100 Cha
  17. Samuel Aaron Funt
    136 Funt
  18. Emmet John Jordan
    47 Jordan
  19. Min Yuen   Teo
    105 Teo
  20. Eugene J Pietzak
    116 Pietzak
  21. Alvin Chun chin Goh
    72 Goh
  22. Nima Almassi
    26 Almassi
  23. Karissa A. Whiting
    47 Whiting
  24. Andrew Thomas Lenis
    23 Lenis