Second version of the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation framework including response evaluation for clinical trials (PROMISE V2) Review


Authors: Seifert, R.; Emmett, L.; Rowe, S. P.; Herrmann, K.; Hadaschik, B.; Calais, J.; Giesel, F. L.; Reiter, R.; Maurer, T.; Heck, M.; Gafita, A.; Morris, M. J.; Fanti, S.; Weber, W. A.; Hope, T. A.; Hofman, M. S.; Fendler, W. P.; Eiber, M.
Review Title: Second version of the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation framework including response evaluation for clinical trials (PROMISE V2)
Abstract: Context: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting positron emission tomography (PET) is emerging to become a reference imaging tool for the staging and restaging of patients with prostate cancer for both clinical routine and trials. The prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE) criteria have been proposed as a framework for whole-body staging (molecular imaging TNM staging, denoted miTNM staging) to describe the prostate cancer disease extent on PSMA-PET. Objective: To create a comprehensive and integrated framework for PSMA-PET image interpretation and reporting. Evidence acquisition: We propose the PROMISE V2 framework, which integrates an updated miTNM system, improved assessment of local disease, and a slightly modified PSMA-expression score for clinical routine. We have added a response monitoring framework defining qualitative and quantitative parameters to be recorded for a longitudinal assessment in clinical trials. Evidence synthesis: We provide a comprehensive literature review on the current use of the PROMISE framework in clinical research and prospective trials. PROMISE variables demonstrate a clear association with survival. PSMA expression assessed by the PSMA-expression score was used in several trials, and a low PSMA-expression score is a negative prognosticator of overall survival after 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy. The proposed imaging parameters recorded for response assessment in clinical trials can be utilized to determine response according to PSMA-PET progression (PPP) or Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA-PET/Computed Tomography (RECIP) frameworks, but also future response criteria. Conclusions: PROMISE V2 offers standardized reporting of disease extent for clinical routine and research. Parameters recorded within clinical trials facilitate objective response assessment. Patient summary: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting positron emission tomography (PET) has become a standard imaging examination for prostate cancer. We propose a comprehensive framework for the analysis and reporting of PSMA-PET findings that will improve the communication between imaging experts and uro-oncologists. © 2023 The Authors
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; unclassified drug; overall survival; review; cancer staging; positron emission tomography; lymph node metastasis; prospective study; prospective studies; metabolism; image analysis; tumor volume; molecular imaging; diagnostic imaging; distant metastasis; high risk patient; prostate cancer; prostatic neoplasms; prostate specific membrane antigen; systematic review; prostate tumor; positron-emission tomography; clinical evaluation; radiopharmaceutical agent; clinical research; biochemical recurrence; gallium; procedures; radioligand; cancer prognosis; gallium radioisotopes; humans; human; male; metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer; positron emission tomography-computed tomography; positron emission tomography computed tomography; prostate specific membrane antigen lu 177; prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation; prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting positron emission tomography; psma-rads
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 83
Issue: 5
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2023-05-01
Start Page: 405
End Page: 412
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.002
PUBMED: 36935345
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 1 May 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Michael Morris
    566 Morris