Indicators of clinical trajectory in patients with cancer who receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation Journal Article


Authors: Chawla, S.; Gutierrez, C.; Rajendram, P.; Seier, K.; Tan, K. S.; Stoudt, K.; Von-Maszewski, M.; Morales-Estrella, J. L.; Kostelecky, N. T.; Voigt, L. P.
Article Title: Indicators of clinical trajectory in patients with cancer who receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer who require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) historically have had low survival to hospital discharge; however, overall CPR outcomes and cancer survival have improved. Identifying patients with cancer who are unlikely to survive CPR could guide and improve end-of-life discussions prior to cardiac arrest. METHODS: Demographics, clinical variables, and outcomes including immediate and hospital survival for patients with cancer aged ≥18 years who required in-hospital CPR from 2012 to 2015 were collected. Indicators capturing the overall declining clinical and oncologic trajectory (ie, no further therapeutic options for cancer, recommendation for hospice, or recommendation for do not resuscitate) prior to CPR were determined a priori and manually identified. RESULTS: Of 854 patients with cancer who underwent CPR, the median age was 63 years and 43.6% were female; solid cancers accounted for 60.6% of diagnoses. A recursive partitioning model selected having any indicator of declining trajectory as the most predictive factor in hospital outcome. Of our study group, 249 (29%) patients were found to have at least one indicator identified prior to CPR and only 5 survived to discharge. Patients with an indicator were more likely to die in the hospital and none were alive at 6 months after discharge. These patients were younger (median age, 59 vs 64 years; P≤.001), had a higher incidence of metastatic disease (83.0% vs 62.9%; P<.001), and were more likely to undergo CPR in the ICU (55.8% vs 36.5%; P<.001) compared with those without an indicator. Of patients without an indicator, 145 (25%) were discharged alive and half received some form of cancer intervention after CPR. CONCLUSIONS: Providers can use easily identifiable indicators to ascertain which patients with cancer are at risk for death despite CPR and are unlikely to survive to discharge. These findings can guide discussions regarding utility of resuscitation and the lack of further cancer interventions even if CPR is successful.
Keywords: adolescent; adult; middle aged; neoplasm; neoplasms; hospital; hospitals; hospital discharge; malignancy; patient discharge; resuscitation; heart arrest; cardiopulmonary arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; cancer; humans; human; male; female
Journal Title: Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Volume: 21
Issue: 1
ISSN: 1540-1405
Publisher: Harborside Press  
Date Published: 2023-01-01
Start Page: 51
End Page: 59.e10
Language: English
DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7072
PUBMED: 36634611
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10228640
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Sanjay Chawla -- Export Date: 1 February 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sanjay Chawla
    49 Chawla
  2. Louis Pierre-Paul Voigt
    85 Voigt
  3. Natalie Theresa Remor
    39 Remor
  4. Kay See   Tan
    241 Tan
  5. Kenneth Seier
    104 Seier
  6. Kara Christine Stoudt
    3 Stoudt