Demonstrating the impact of POLST forms on hospital care requires information not contained in state registries Journal Article


Authors: Turnbull, A. E.; Ning, X.; Rao, A.; Tao, J. J.; Needham, D. M.
Article Title: Demonstrating the impact of POLST forms on hospital care requires information not contained in state registries
Abstract: Background Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) programs have expanded rapidly, but evaluating their impact on hospital care is challenging. Objectives To demonstrate how careful study design can reveal POLST’s impact at hospital admission and why analyses of state registry data are unlikely to capture POLST’s effects. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting and participants Adult in-patients with Do Not Intubate and/or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR/I) orders in the electronic medical record at the time of discharge from Johns Hopkins Hospital over 18 months. For patients with unplanned readmissions within 30 days, records were reviewed to determine if a Maryland Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form was presented and for the time from readmission to a DNR/I order in the EMR. Analyses were stratified by whether patients could communicate or were accompanied by a proxy at readmission. Results Among 1,507 patients with DNR/I orders at discharge, 124 (8%) had unplanned readmissions, 112 (90%) could communicate or were accompanied by a proxy at readmission, and 12 (10%) could not communicate and were unaccompanied. For patients who were unaccompanied and could not communicate, MOLST significantly decreased the median time from readmission to DNR/I order (1.2 vs 27.1 hours, P = .001), but this association was greatly attenuated among patients who could communicate or were accompanied by a proxy (16.4 vs 25.4 hours P = .10). Conclusion Among patients who wanted to avoid intubation and/or CPR, MOLST forms were protective when the patient was unaccompanied by a healthcare proxy at admission and could not communicate. Fewer than 10% of patients met these criteria during unplanned readmissions, and state registry data does not allow this sub-population to be identified. © 2019 Turnbull et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; major clinical study; prospective study; cohort analysis; hospital care; electronic medical record; hospital readmission; proxy; life sustaining treatment; human; male; female; article; do not resuscitate order; do not intubate order; medical order
Journal Title: PLoS ONE
Volume: 14
Issue: 6
ISSN: 1932-6203
Publisher: Public Library of Science  
Date Published: 2019-06-18
Start Page: e0217113
Language: English
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217113
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC6581427
PUBMED: 31211788
DOI/URL:
Notes: Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jessica Jing Tao
    11 Tao