Gene-based confirmatory germline testing following tumor-only sequencing of prostate cancer Journal Article


Authors: Truong, H.; Breen, K.; Nandakumar, S.; Sjoberg, D. D.; Kemel, Y.; Mehta, N.; Lenis, A. T.; Reisz, P. A.; Carruthers, J.; Benfante, N.; Joseph, V.; Khurram, A.; Gopalan, A.; Fine, S. W.; Reuter, V. E.; Vickers, A. J.; Birsoy, O.; Liu, Y.; Walsh, M.; Latham, A.; Mandelker, D.; Stadler, Z. K.; Pietzak, E.; Ehdaie, B.; Touijer, K. A.; Laudone, V. P.; Slovin, S. F.; Autio, K. A.; Danila, D. C.; Rathkopf, D. E.; Eastham, J. A.; Chen, Y.; Morris, M. J.; Offit, K.; Solit, D. B.; Scher, H. I.; Abida, W.; Robson, M. E.; Carlo, M. I.
Article Title: Gene-based confirmatory germline testing following tumor-only sequencing of prostate cancer
Abstract: Background: Tumor-only genomic profiling is an important tool in therapeutic management of men with prostate cancer. Since clinically actionable germline variants may be reflected in tumor profiling, it is critical to identify which variants have a higher risk of being germline in origin to better counsel patients and prioritize genetic testing. Objective: To determine when variants found on tumor-only sequencing of prostate cancers should prompt confirmatory germline testing. Design, setting, and participants: Men with prostate cancer who underwent both tumor and germline sequencing at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2020 were evaluated. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Tumor and germline profiles were analyzed for pathogenic and likely pathogenic (“pathogenic”) variants in 60 moderate- or high-penetrance genes associated with cancer predisposition. The germline probability (germline/germline + somatic) of a variant was calculated for each gene. Clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed as potential modifiers of germline probability. Results and limitations: Of the 1883 patients identified, 1084 (58%) had a somatic or germline pathogenic variant in one of 60 cancer susceptibility genes, and of them, 240 (22%) had at least one germline variant. Overall, the most frequent variants were in TP53, PTEN, APC, BRCA2, RB1, ATM, and CHEK2. Variants in TP53, PTEN, or RB1 were identified in 746 (40%) patients and were exclusively somatic. Variants with the highest germline probabilities were in PALB2 (69%), MITF (62%), HOXB13 (60%), CHEK2 (55%), BRCA1 (55%), and BRCA2 (47%), and the overall germline probability of a variant in any DNA damage repair gene was 40%. Limitations were that most of the men included in the cohort had metastatic disease, and different thresholds for pathogenicity exist for somatic and germline variants. Conclusions: Of patients with pathogenic variants found on prostate tumor sequencing, 22% had clinically actionable germline variants, for which the germline probabilities varied widely by gene. Our results provide an evidenced-based clinical framework to prioritize referral to genetic counseling following tumor-only sequencing. Patient summary: Patients with advanced prostate cancer are recommended to have germline genetic testing. Genetic sequencing of a patient's prostate tumor may also identify certain gene variants that are inherited. We found that patients who had variants in certain genes, such as ones that function in DNA damage repair, identified in their prostate tumor sequencing, had a high risk for having an inherited cancer syndrome. © 2022 European Association of Urology
Keywords: adult; controlled study; middle aged; unclassified drug; major clinical study; sequence analysis; somatic mutation; genetics; clinical feature; advanced cancer; comparative study; dna repair; cancer susceptibility; genetic predisposition to disease; metastasis; protein; cohort analysis; genetic association; cancer screening; brca1 protein; brca2 protein; protein p53; carcinogenesis; prostate cancer; prostatic neoplasms; cancer center; heterozygosity; microsatellite instability; family history; prostate tumor; phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5 trisphosphate 3 phosphatase; atm protein; genomics; checkpoint kinase 2; microphthalmia associated transcription factor; tumor suppressor protein; genetic predisposition; genetic screening; lynch syndrome; protein msh6; apc protein; germ-line mutation; genetic testing; penetrance; molecular pathology; clinical outcome; germline mutation; retinoblastoma binding protein 1; advanced prostate cancer; dna sequencing; humans; human; male; article; hereditary tumor syndrome; mutl protein homolog 1; dna mismatch repair protein msh2; germline testing; tumor mutational burden; tumor-only sequencing; dna damage repair genes; hoxb13 protein; familial renal cell carcinoma
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 83
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2023-01-01
Start Page: 29
End Page: 38
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.028
PUBMED: 36115772
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10208030
DOI/URL:
Notes: Maria I. Carlo is the corresponding author for this article -- Export Date: 3 January 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kenneth Offit
    788 Offit
  2. Vincent Laudone
    136 Laudone
  3. Susan Slovin
    254 Slovin
  4. Michael Morris
    577 Morris
  5. Mark E Robson
    676 Robson
  6. David Solit
    778 Solit
  7. Yu Chen
    133 Chen
  8. Karen Anne Autio
    118 Autio
  9. Zsofia Kinga Stadler
    387 Stadler
  10. Karim Abdelkrim Touijer
    257 Touijer
  11. Anuradha Gopalan
    411 Gopalan
  12. Andrew J Vickers
    880 Vickers
  13. Daniel D. Sjoberg
    234 Sjoberg
  14. Behfar Ehdaie
    173 Ehdaie
  15. Dana Elizabeth Rathkopf
    271 Rathkopf
  16. James Eastham
    537 Eastham
  17. Vijai Joseph
    211 Joseph
  18. Samson W Fine
    457 Fine
  19. Victor Reuter
    1223 Reuter
  20. Howard Scher
    1129 Scher
  21. Daniel C Danila
    154 Danila
  22. Wassim Abida
    154 Abida
  23. Yelena Kemel
    103 Kemel
  24. Maria Isabel Carlo
    161 Carlo
  25. Michael Francis Walsh
    156 Walsh
  26. Nicole E Benfante
    160 Benfante
  27. Eugene J Pietzak
    116 Pietzak
  28. Diana Lauren Mandelker
    178 Mandelker
  29. Ozge Birsoy
    69 Birsoy
  30. Ying Liu
    105 Liu
  31. Alicia Latham
    58 Latham
  32. Kelsey E Breen
    18 Breen
  33. Aliya Khurram
    22 Khurram
  34. Nikita Navinchandra Mehta
    16 Mehta
  35. Peter Anselm Reisz
    17 Reisz
  36. Andrew Thomas Lenis
    23 Lenis
  37. Hong Truong
    19 Truong