Comprehensive assessment of germline pathogenic variant detection in tumor-only sequencing Journal Article


Authors: Terraf, P.; Pareja, F.; Brown, D. N.; Ceyhan-Birsoy, O.; Misyura, M.; Rana, S.; O'Reilly, E.; Carlo, M. I.; Aghajanian, C.; Liu, Y.; Derakhshan, F.; Jayakumaran, G.; Weigelt, B.; Walsh, M.; Stadler, Z.; Offit, K.; Ladanyi, M.; Robson, M.; Zehir, A.; Reis-Filho, J. S.; Mandelker, D.
Article Title: Comprehensive assessment of germline pathogenic variant detection in tumor-only sequencing
Abstract: Background: Tumor-only sequencing, implemented for the identification of somatic variants, is oftentimes used for the detection of actionable germline variants. We sought to determine whether tumor-only sequencing assays are suitable for detection of actionable germline variants, given their importance for the delivery of targeted therapies and risk-reducing measures. Patients and methods: The detection of germline variants affecting moderate-and high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) by tumor-only sequencing was compared to clinical germline testing in 21333 cancer patients who underwent tumor and germline testing using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Targets (MSK-IMPACT) assay. Seven homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), two DNA damage response (DDR) and four mismatch repair (MMR) genes, as well as NF1, RB1 and TP53 were included in the analysis. FDA-authorized and New York State Department of Health-approved sequencing methods for germline, tumor/normal and tumor-only sequencing assays and analytical pipelines were employed. Results: In patients who underwent tumor and germline sequencing, as compared to clinical genetic testing, tumor-only sequencing failed to detect 10.5% of clinically actionable pathogenic germline variants in CSGs, including 18.8%, 12.8% and 7.3% of germline variants in MMR, DDR and HRD genes, respectively. The sensitivity for detection of pathogenic germline variants by tumor-only sequencing was 89.5%. Whilst the vast majority of pathogenic germline exonic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small indels were detected by tumor-only sequencing, large percentages of germline copy number variants, intronic variants and repetitive element insertions were not detected. Conclusions: Tumor-only sequencing is adequate for the detection of clinically actionable germline variants, particularly for SNVs and small indels; however, a small subset of alterations affecting HRD, DDR and MMR genes may not be detected optimally. Therefore, for high-risk patients with negative tumor-only sequencing results, clinical genetic testing could be considered given the impact of these variants on therapy and genetic counseling.
Keywords: olaparib; mutations; cancer; precision medicine; germline testing; tumor-only sequencing
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 33
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2022-04-01
Start Page: 426
End Page: 433
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000820214100009
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.006
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC9172914
PUBMED: 35074424
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kenneth Offit
    788 Offit
  2. Mark E Robson
    676 Robson
  3. Zsofia Kinga Stadler
    391 Stadler
  4. Marc Ladanyi
    1328 Ladanyi
  5. Ahmet Zehir
    343 Zehir
  6. Eileen O'Reilly
    780 O'Reilly
  7. Maria Isabel Carlo
    162 Carlo
  8. Britta Weigelt
    633 Weigelt
  9. Michael Francis Walsh
    156 Walsh
  10. Diana Lauren Mandelker
    178 Mandelker
  11. Ozge Birsoy
    69 Birsoy
  12. Ying Liu
    105 Liu
  13. Satshil Rana
    37 Rana
  14. David Norman Brown
    91 Brown
  15. Maksym Misyura
    13 Misyura
  16. Panieh Terraf
    19 Terraf